Evaluating food portion estimation accuracy with multi-angle photographs

The accuracy of food quantity estimation varies depending on the type of food and the shooting angle. For solid foods, 45° provided the best accuracy, whereas 70° was most accurate for beverages. Combining different angles improved the estimation accuracy for most food types.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nutrition Research and Practice
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4162/nrp.2025.19.4.605
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Nutritional Studies and Diet
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.88
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating food portion estimation accuracy with multi-angle photographs

Mi‐Hyun Kim, In-Young Choi
1 citations
Nutrition Research and Practice
Nutritional Studies and Diet
1.88
article

Evaluating food portion estimation accuracy with multi-angle photographs

Mi‐Hyun Kim, In-Young Choi
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The accuracy of food quantity estimation varies depending on the type of food and the shooting angle. For solid foods, 45° provided the best accuracy, whereas 70° was most accurate for beverages. Combining different angles improved the estimation accuracy for most food types.

Nutrition Research and PracticeVol. 19(4)
Kongju National University (KR)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Nutritional Studies and Diet
1.88
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Evaluating food portion estimation accuracy with multi-angle photographs — Mi‐Hyun Kim, In-Young Choi · Nutrition Research and Practice (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS