Meta-evaluative practices of Clinical and Translational Research evaluators
Findings suggest the importance of internally adopting a participatory, collaborative approach to evaluation and externally sharing insights with and adopting strategies from fellow evaluators within a learning community. This study promotes the value of conducting meta-evaluation in CTR settings, demonstrates means for and results from doing so, and shares best practices for addressing challenges encountered by many CTR evaluators.
Authors
- Susan P. Giancola (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7928-8542)
- Ingrid Philibert (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7221-955X)
- John Stevenson (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9072-9425)
Institutions
- University of Rhode Island (US)
- Quinnipiac University (US)
- University of Delaware (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
- Published
- 2025-01-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1017/cts.2025.10121
- Primary Topic
- Health and Medical Research Impacts
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- University of Cambridge
- National Institutes of Health
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences