Drying Kinetics and Quality Evaluation of Mace Under Solar, Vacuum, and Hot‐Air Drying Methods

ABSTRACT This study explored the impact of different drying methods namely solar‐biomass, vacuum, and hot‐air drying, on the drying characteristics, essential oil, oleoresin, and lycopene contents of mace. The research highlighted the importance of optimizing drying techniques to preserve the quality and bioactive compounds of mace, a valuable spice derived from nutmeg. Work compared drying efficiency and quality retention across the three drying methods. Experimental setup utilized a solar‐biomass hybrid dryer with supplementary heating, alongside vacuum and hot‐air dryers at temperatures of 45°C, 50°C, 55°C, and 60°C. The methodology involved measuring moisture reduction from an initial 55%–60% to a final 7%–8%, with vacuum drying achieving this in 4 h, hot‐air drying in 6 h, and solar‐biomass drying requiring 18 h. The drying process exhibited a falling rate period, with vacuum and hot‐air drying reaching a maximum drying rate of 1.06 g/g dry mass·h, compared to 0.97 g/g dry mass·h for solar‐biomass drying. Results revealed that vacuum‐dried mace at 60°C yielded the highest essential oil (7.92%) and oleoresin (19.55%) contents, while hot‐air‐dried mace at 55°C had the lowest essential oil (7.63%) and oleoresin (18.44%). Solar‐biomass‐dried mace showed intermediate values (7.82% essential oil, 19.06% oleoresin). Lycopene content was highest in vacuum‐dried mace (153.47 μg/mL), followed by hot‐air (145.71 μg/mL) and solar‐biomass (144.54 μg/mL) dried samples, indicating the superiority of vacuum drying in preserving bioactive compounds.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Food Process Engineering
Published
2025-08-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jfpe.70212
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Food Drying and Modeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.16
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Drying Kinetics and Quality Evaluation of Mace Under Solar, Vacuum, and Hot‐Air Drying Methods

P.V. Alfiya, E. Jayashree, K. Anees, K. Sunisha
1 citations
Journal of Food Process Engineering
Food Drying and Modeling
1.16
article

Drying Kinetics and Quality Evaluation of Mace Under Solar, Vacuum, and Hot‐Air Drying Methods

P.V. Alfiya, E. Jayashree, K. Anees, K. Sunisha
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study explored the impact of different drying methods namely solar‐biomass, vacuum, and hot‐air drying, on the drying characteristics, essential oil, oleoresin, and lycopene contents of mace. The research highlighted the importance of optimizing drying techniques to preserve the quality and bioactive compounds of mace, a valuable spice derived from nutmeg. Work compared drying efficiency and quality retention across the three drying methods. Experimental setup utilized a solar‐biomass hybrid dryer with supplementary heating, alongside vacuum and hot‐air dryers at temperatures of 45°C, 50°C, 55°C, and 60°C. The methodology involved measuring moisture reduction from an initial 55%–60% to a final 7%–8%, with vacuum drying achieving this in 4 h, hot‐air drying in 6 h, and solar‐biomass drying requiring 18 h. The drying process exhibited a falling rate period, with vacuum and hot‐air drying reaching a maximum drying rate of 1.06 g/g dry mass·h, compared to 0.97 g/g dry mass·h for solar‐biomass drying. Results revealed that vacuum‐dried mace at 60°C yielded the highest essential oil (7.92%) and oleoresin (19.55%) contents, while hot‐air‐dried mace at 55°C had the lowest essential oil (7.63%) and oleoresin (18.44%). Solar‐biomass‐dried mace showed intermediate values (7.82% essential oil, 19.06% oleoresin). Lycopene content was highest in vacuum‐dried mace (153.47 μg/mL), followed by hot‐air (145.71 μg/mL) and solar‐biomass (144.54 μg/mL) dried samples, indicating the superiority of vacuum drying in preserving bioactive compounds.

Journal of Food Process EngineeringVol. 48(8)
Indian Institute of Spices Research (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Food Drying and Modeling
1.16
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.