Locomotion efficiency of elephants: mechanical work and energetics

Understanding how large terrestrial animals manage the energetic demands of locomotion remains a major question in biomechanics. Although smaller animals have been well studied, data on species exceeding 1 ton are scarce, making it difficult to evaluate whether principles derived from small and medium-sized species hold at the upper limits of body size. In this study, we examined the mechanical work of locomotion in 27 Asian elephants (872-4000 kg) across a large range of speed of progression. We quantified the internal work required to move the limbs relative to the whole-body centre of mass (COM) and combined it with external work to estimate total mechanical cost. Our results show that elephants devote a surprisingly large proportion of total mechanical work - up to ∼75% at higher speeds - to move the limbs. This highlights the importance of internal limb dynamics in shaping the energetic profile of large quadrupeds. Using published metabolic cost values for elephants, we estimate that their muscular efficiency during locomotion ranges between ∼30% and 45%, values that fall within the range reported for other large mammals such as horses and humans. Together, these findings offer the first detailed breakdown of internal and external mechanical work in elephant locomotion and provide novel insights into how extreme body size influences the partitioning of mechanical work. This study contributes new data essential for understanding locomotor energetics at the upper limits of terrestrial animal mass.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Experimental Biology
Published
2025-08-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.250928
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Robotic Locomotion and Control
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.35

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Locomotion efficiency of elephants: mechanical work and energetics

Arthur H. Dewolf, Joakim Genin, N. C. Heglund, P. A. Willems
2 citations
Journal of Experimental Biology
Robotic Locomotion and Control
1.35
article

Locomotion efficiency of elephants: mechanical work and energetics

Arthur H. Dewolf, Joakim Genin, N. C. Heglund, P. A. Willems
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Understanding how large terrestrial animals manage the energetic demands of locomotion remains a major question in biomechanics. Although smaller animals have been well studied, data on species exceeding 1 ton are scarce, making it difficult to evaluate whether principles derived from small and medium-sized species hold at the upper limits of body size. In this study, we examined the mechanical work of locomotion in 27 Asian elephants (872-4000 kg) across a large range of speed of progression. We quantified the internal work required to move the limbs relative to the whole-body centre of mass (COM) and combined it with external work to estimate total mechanical cost. Our results show that elephants devote a surprisingly large proportion of total mechanical work - up to ∼75% at higher speeds - to move the limbs. This highlights the importance of internal limb dynamics in shaping the energetic profile of large quadrupeds. Using published metabolic cost values for elephants, we estimate that their muscular efficiency during locomotion ranges between ∼30% and 45%, values that fall within the range reported for other large mammals such as horses and humans. Together, these findings offer the first detailed breakdown of internal and external mechanical work in elephant locomotion and provide novel insights into how extreme body size influences the partitioning of mechanical work. This study contributes new data essential for understanding locomotor energetics at the upper limits of terrestrial animal mass.

Journal of Experimental BiologyVol. 228(15)
UCLouvain (BE)
Fonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRS
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Robotic Locomotion and Control
1.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.