Compressive Strength of Cement‐Based Composites Using Machine Learning Models

ABSTRACT This work aims to compare the compressive strength of cellulose nanofibrils (CNFs) reinforced concrete, cement paste, and cement mortar utilizing machine learning models for prediction before construction. To obtain this goal, the ten supervised regression ML models were executed. The datasets with an experimental foundation consisting of 266, 233, and 196 data points for cement paste, cement mortar, and concrete respectively were set and split into training and testing groups for the models' execution. There were seven input parameters: cement, water, CNFs, superplasticizer, fine aggregate, coarse aggregate, and age, and one output parameter: compressive strength f c . The results declared that seven models for cement paste, six models for cement mortar, and eight models for concrete had a strong ability to predict compressive strength. According to the sensitivity analysis, water and cement were the parameters with the largest impacts on predicting the CNFs reinforced cement‐based composites, while coarse aggregate was the smallest. It can be concluded that Extreme Gradient Boosting Regression, Gradient Boosting Regression, and Random Forest models for concrete; Extreme Gradient Boosting Regression, Gradient Boosting Regression, and Decision Tree models for cement paste; and K‐Nearest Neighbors, Bagging Regressor, and Random Forest models for cement mortar were the best prediction models.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Engineering Reports
Published
2025-08-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/eng2.70265
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Innovative concrete reinforcement materials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.95
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Compressive Strength of Cement‐Based Composites Using Machine Learning Models

Aftab Anwar, Jing Li, Yuanjun Jiang, Wania Naz et al.
1 citations
Engineering Reports
Innovative concrete reinforcement materials
0.95
article

Compressive Strength of Cement‐Based Composites Using Machine Learning Models

Aftab Anwar, Jing Li, Yuanjun Jiang, Wania Naz, Yanwei Wang, Jing Wang, Wenyi Yang
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT This work aims to compare the compressive strength of cellulose nanofibrils (CNFs) reinforced concrete, cement paste, and cement mortar utilizing machine learning models for prediction before construction. To obtain this goal, the ten supervised regression ML models were executed. The datasets with an experimental foundation consisting of 266, 233, and 196 data points for cement paste, cement mortar, and concrete respectively were set and split into training and testing groups for the models' execution. There were seven input parameters: cement, water, CNFs, superplasticizer, fine aggregate, coarse aggregate, and age, and one output parameter: compressive strength f c . The results declared that seven models for cement paste, six models for cement mortar, and eight models for concrete had a strong ability to predict compressive strength. According to the sensitivity analysis, water and cement were the parameters with the largest impacts on predicting the CNFs reinforced cement‐based composites, while coarse aggregate was the smallest. It can be concluded that Extreme Gradient Boosting Regression, Gradient Boosting Regression, and Random Forest models for concrete; Extreme Gradient Boosting Regression, Gradient Boosting Regression, and Decision Tree models for cement paste; and K‐Nearest Neighbors, Bagging Regressor, and Random Forest models for cement mortar were the best prediction models.

Engineering ReportsVol. 7(8)
Yunnan Agricultural University (CN), Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), University of Balochistan (PK), Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment (CN), Yunnan Water Conservancy and Hydropower Survey and Design Institute (CN), University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Innovative concrete reinforcement materials
0.95
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.