Could Pancreatic Islet Transplantation Outcome Be Impacted by Overestimating Islet Volume? Insights From a Serial Section Study

<b>Introduction:</b> The outcome of pancreatic islet transplantation surgery is influenced by factors like islet volume, purity, and dimensions. Single paraffin section measurement may underestimate islet diameter. Researchers have identified limitations in measuring islet equivalent quantity. This study quantified maximum islet diameter using serial sections and compared it with paraffin sections. We also evaluated actual islet volume and compared it with IEQ based on diameter measurements. <b>Materials and Methods:</b> This study utilized pancreatic tissue from six adult human samples. Serial sections were stained immunohistochemically using anti-synaptophysin antibody. Islets were identified and measured using serial sections to determine their diameter and volume. The maximum average diameter across sections was used to calculate the islet diameter. Islet volume was calculated by summing areas across sections and correcting for section thickness and interval. We compared the calculated IEQ based on the diameter and volume. <b>Results:</b> The study revealed significant discrepancies between pancreatic islet diameter measured from single paraffin sections and those determined from serial sections. The mean sectional diameter was 23.37% smaller than the actual diameter (<i>p</i> < 0.0001), with larger islets showing a more significant underestimation. IEQ based on diameter was overestimated by 87.51% compared to IEQ based on actual volume, with large islets contributing significantly to this discrepancy (111.7%). <b>Conclusions:</b> Single paraffin section analyses underestimate islet dimensions, especially for islets > 125<i> μ</i>m in diameter. Using conversion factors from this study provides accurate size assessments. To enhance transplantation accuracy, it is essential to use robust size calculations rather than binning. Using the islet diameter tends to overestimate their volume, particularly when the islet index is ≥ 1 (as most islets are larger than 150 <i>μ</i>m in diameter). This overestimation increases the risk of unfavorable transplantation outcomes. Thus, IEQ should be adjusted to the upper range when the islet index is ≥ 1, accounting for the potential overestimation of islet volume.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Diabetes Research
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1155/jdr/8940783
Primary Topic
Pancreatic function and diabetes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Could Pancreatic Islet Transplantation Outcome Be Impacted by Overestimating Islet Volume? Insights From a Serial Section Study

Praveen Kumar Ravi, Sipra Rout, P Mishra, Appakalai N. Balamurugan et al.
Journal of Diabetes Research
Pancreatic function and diabetes
article

Could Pancreatic Islet Transplantation Outcome Be Impacted by Overestimating Islet Volume? Insights From a Serial Section Study

Praveen Kumar Ravi, Sipra Rout, P Mishra, Appakalai N. Balamurugan, A. Sahu, Sashikanta Swain
article en

Abstract

<b>Introduction:</b> The outcome of pancreatic islet transplantation surgery is influenced by factors like islet volume, purity, and dimensions. Single paraffin section measurement may underestimate islet diameter. Researchers have identified limitations in measuring islet equivalent quantity. This study quantified maximum islet diameter using serial sections and compared it with paraffin sections. We also evaluated actual islet volume and compared it with IEQ based on diameter measurements. <b>Materials and Methods:</b> This study utilized pancreatic tissue from six adult human samples. Serial sections were stained immunohistochemically using anti-synaptophysin antibody. Islets were identified and measured using serial sections to determine their diameter and volume. The maximum average diameter across sections was used to calculate the islet diameter. Islet volume was calculated by summing areas across sections and correcting for section thickness and interval. We compared the calculated IEQ based on the diameter and volume. <b>Results:</b> The study revealed significant discrepancies between pancreatic islet diameter measured from single paraffin sections and those determined from serial sections. The mean sectional diameter was 23.37% smaller than the actual diameter (<i>p</i> < 0.0001), with larger islets showing a more significant underestimation. IEQ based on diameter was overestimated by 87.51% compared to IEQ based on actual volume, with large islets contributing significantly to this discrepancy (111.7%). <b>Conclusions:</b> Single paraffin section analyses underestimate islet dimensions, especially for islets > 125<i> μ</i>m in diameter. Using conversion factors from this study provides accurate size assessments. To enhance transplantation accuracy, it is essential to use robust size calculations rather than binning. Using the islet diameter tends to overestimate their volume, particularly when the islet index is ≥ 1 (as most islets are larger than 150 <i>μ</i>m in diameter). This overestimation increases the risk of unfavorable transplantation outcomes. Thus, IEQ should be adjusted to the upper range when the islet index is ≥ 1, accounting for the potential overestimation of islet volume.

Journal of Diabetes ResearchVol. 2025(1)
Norton Healthcare (US), All India Institute of Medical Sciences Bhubaneswar (IN)
Indian Council of Medical Research
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Pancreatic function and diabetes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.