Comparison of Matrix Rhythm Therapy versus Conventional Physiotherapy on Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease

Background: Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) arises when stomach acid reflux results in bothersome symptoms. Previous research has demonstrated that each of the three techniques – diaphragmatic breathing (DB), diaphragmatic stretch, and progressive muscle relaxation – reduces the symptoms of GERD. This study aims to compare the effect of matrix rhythm therapy (MaRhyThe) to the effects of conventional physiotherapy on GERD. Materials and Methods: Twenty-two participants aged between 30 and 50 years were divided at random into Groups A and B. Group A received MaRhyThe and Group B received conventional physiotherapy, i.e. DB, diaphragmatic stretch, and relaxation techniques. The participants in both groups were treated for 5 weeks, with one session per week, each lasting 45 min. The outcome measures included three scales – GERD Questionnaire Scale, GERD-health-related quality of life (QOL) Scale, and GERD-QOL Scale. Participants filled out these questionnaires before and post their treatment. Results: The Shapiro–Wilk test suggested that the collected data are within normal distribution. A paired sample t -test revealed that both groups had improved significantly. The independent t -test showed more improvement in Group A than in Group B. Conclusion: The study concludes that both MaRhyThe and conventional physiotherapy have proven beneficial in relieving the participants’ symptoms. However, MaRhyThe proved more beneficial than conventional physiotherapy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Indian Journal of Physical Therapy and Research
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4103/ijptr.ijptr_50_25
Primary Topic
Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Matrix Rhythm Therapy versus Conventional Physiotherapy on Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease

Supreet P Marathe, Motimath Basavaraj, MARIAM SAYED, Luís Vaz
Indian Journal of Physical Therapy and Research
Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments
article

Comparison of Matrix Rhythm Therapy versus Conventional Physiotherapy on Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease

Supreet P Marathe, Motimath Basavaraj, MARIAM SAYED, Luís Vaz
article en

Abstract

Background: Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) arises when stomach acid reflux results in bothersome symptoms. Previous research has demonstrated that each of the three techniques – diaphragmatic breathing (DB), diaphragmatic stretch, and progressive muscle relaxation – reduces the symptoms of GERD. This study aims to compare the effect of matrix rhythm therapy (MaRhyThe) to the effects of conventional physiotherapy on GERD. Materials and Methods: Twenty-two participants aged between 30 and 50 years were divided at random into Groups A and B. Group A received MaRhyThe and Group B received conventional physiotherapy, i.e. DB, diaphragmatic stretch, and relaxation techniques. The participants in both groups were treated for 5 weeks, with one session per week, each lasting 45 min. The outcome measures included three scales – GERD Questionnaire Scale, GERD-health-related quality of life (QOL) Scale, and GERD-QOL Scale. Participants filled out these questionnaires before and post their treatment. Results: The Shapiro–Wilk test suggested that the collected data are within normal distribution. A paired sample t -test revealed that both groups had improved significantly. The independent t -test showed more improvement in Group A than in Group B. Conclusion: The study concludes that both MaRhyThe and conventional physiotherapy have proven beneficial in relieving the participants’ symptoms. However, MaRhyThe proved more beneficial than conventional physiotherapy.

Indian Journal of Physical Therapy and ResearchVol. 7(1)
KLE Academy of Higher Education and Research (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.