The Criticality of Consciousness: Excitatory–Inhibitory Balance and Dual Memory Systems in Active Inference

The organization of consciousness is described through increasingly rich theoretical models. We review evidence that working memory capacity-essential to generating consciousness in the cerebral cortex-is supported by dual limbic memory systems. These dorsal (Papez) and ventral (Yakovlev) limbic networks provide the basis for mnemonic processing and prediction in the dorsal and ventral divisions of the human neocortex. Empirical evidence suggests that the dorsal limbic division is (i) regulated preferentially by excitatory <i>feedforward</i> control, (ii) consolidated by REM sleep, and (iii) controlled in waking by phasic arousal through lemnothalamic projections from the pontine brainstem reticular activating system. The ventral limbic division and striatum, (i) organizes the inhibitory neurophysiology of NREM to (ii) consolidate explicit memory in sleep, (iii) operating in waking cognition under the same inhibitory <i>feedback</i> control supported by collothalamic tonic activation from the midbrain. We propose that (i) these dual (excitatory and inhibitory) systems alternate in the stages of sleep, and (ii) in waking they must be balanced-<i>at criticality</i>-to optimize the active inference that generates conscious experiences. Optimal Bayesian belief updating rests on balanced feedforward (excitatory predictive) and feedback (inhibitory corrective) control biases that play the role of prior and likelihood (i.e., sensory) precision. Because the excitatory (<b>E</b>) phasic arousal and inhibitory (<b>I</b>) tonic activation systems that regulate these dual limbic divisions have distinct affective properties, varying levels of elation for phasic arousal (<b>E</b>) and anxiety for tonic activation (<b>I</b>), the dual control systems regulate sleep and consciousness in ways that are adaptively balanced-around the entropic nadir of <b>E</b>-<b>I</b> criticality-for optimal self-regulation of consciousness and psychological health. Because they are emotive as well as motive control systems, these dual systems have unique qualities of feeling that may be registered as subjective experience.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Entropy
Published
2025-08-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/e27080829
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Neural dynamics and brain function
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.43
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Criticality of Consciousness: Excitatory–Inhibitory Balance and Dual Memory Systems in Active Inference

Don M. Tucker, Phan Luu, Karl Friston
1 citations
Entropy
Neural dynamics and brain function
1.43
article

The Criticality of Consciousness: Excitatory–Inhibitory Balance and Dual Memory Systems in Active Inference

Don M. Tucker, Phan Luu, Karl Friston
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The organization of consciousness is described through increasingly rich theoretical models. We review evidence that working memory capacity-essential to generating consciousness in the cerebral cortex-is supported by dual limbic memory systems. These dorsal (Papez) and ventral (Yakovlev) limbic networks provide the basis for mnemonic processing and prediction in the dorsal and ventral divisions of the human neocortex. Empirical evidence suggests that the dorsal limbic division is (i) regulated preferentially by excitatory <i>feedforward</i> control, (ii) consolidated by REM sleep, and (iii) controlled in waking by phasic arousal through lemnothalamic projections from the pontine brainstem reticular activating system. The ventral limbic division and striatum, (i) organizes the inhibitory neurophysiology of NREM to (ii) consolidate explicit memory in sleep, (iii) operating in waking cognition under the same inhibitory <i>feedback</i> control supported by collothalamic tonic activation from the midbrain. We propose that (i) these dual (excitatory and inhibitory) systems alternate in the stages of sleep, and (ii) in waking they must be balanced-<i>at criticality</i>-to optimize the active inference that generates conscious experiences. Optimal Bayesian belief updating rests on balanced feedforward (excitatory predictive) and feedback (inhibitory corrective) control biases that play the role of prior and likelihood (i.e., sensory) precision. Because the excitatory (<b>E</b>) phasic arousal and inhibitory (<b>I</b>) tonic activation systems that regulate these dual limbic divisions have distinct affective properties, varying levels of elation for phasic arousal (<b>E</b>) and anxiety for tonic activation (<b>I</b>), the dual control systems regulate sleep and consciousness in ways that are adaptively balanced-around the entropic nadir of <b>E</b>-<b>I</b> criticality-for optimal self-regulation of consciousness and psychological health. Because they are emotive as well as motive control systems, these dual systems have unique qualities of feeling that may be registered as subjective experience.

EntropyVol. 27(8)
Queen Mary University of London (GB), University of Oregon (US), Eugene Research Institute (US), VERSES (United States), University College London (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Neural dynamics and brain function
1.43
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.