Implementing a dissimilarity metric for scenarios categorization and selection for automated driving systems

To ensure road traffic safety, the safety verification and validation of automated vehicles are of the utmost importance. Scenario-based testing is one of the most popular approaches, as it is cheaper, safer, and faster than on-road testing. The number of possible scenarios encountered by an automated driving system could be virtually infinite due to the complexity and uncertainty of the driving environment. Hence a framework is needed which expresses the degree of dissimilarity between two driving scenarios quantitatively. This work first develops a dissimilarity metric that compares different driving scenarios and secondly, categorizes them to identify the most critical ones in each category. This way, a finite set of non-redundant scenarios are identified which can be used for validating the safety of an automated driving system.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IFAC-PapersOnLine
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2025.07.096
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.68
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Implementing a dissimilarity metric for scenarios categorization and selection for automated driving systems

Jeroen Ploeg, Erjen Lefeber, Mohsen Alirezaei, Tajinder Singh et al.
1 citations
IFAC-PapersOnLine
Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
0.68
article

Implementing a dissimilarity metric for scenarios categorization and selection for automated driving systems

Jeroen Ploeg, Erjen Lefeber, Mohsen Alirezaei, Tajinder Singh, Neeraj Dokania
article en
1 citations

Abstract

To ensure road traffic safety, the safety verification and validation of automated vehicles are of the utmost importance. Scenario-based testing is one of the most popular approaches, as it is cheaper, safer, and faster than on-road testing. The number of possible scenarios encountered by an automated driving system could be virtually infinite due to the complexity and uncertainty of the driving environment. Hence a framework is needed which expresses the degree of dissimilarity between two driving scenarios quantitatively. This work first develops a dissimilarity metric that compares different driving scenarios and secondly, categorizes them to identify the most critical ones in each category. This way, a finite set of non-redundant scenarios are identified which can be used for validating the safety of an automated driving system.

IFAC-PapersOnLineVol. 59(5)
Siemens (Germany) (DE), Eindhoven University of Technology (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
0.68
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.