Exploring Vision-Based Features for Detecting Deception in Well-Being: A Cross-Domain Comparison

Deception detection has been extensively studied using vision-based features in domains such as crime, finance, and social interaction. However, little attention has been given to how deception manifests visually in self-reported well-being-a critical area for behavioral health, where inaccurate reporting may affect treatment outcomes and the therapeutic alliance. While clinicians often rely on visual cues such as gaze, facial expressions, and body language to assess deception, these cues remain underutilized in AI-based deception detection in wellbeing scenarios. This study explores vision-based features of deception in the well-being domain and compares them with those from three other domains: biography, academics, and crime. Using mock interview data, we extract facial landmarks, body gestures, and facial action units (AUs) using four feature selection methods. We then visualize and analyze the spatial distribution of features associated with truthful and deceptive responses. Results show that well-being features are generally fewer and more localized-particularly around the nose ridge-with unique presence of eye landmarks and limited hand gestures. In contrast, biography and academics show broader facial and body engagement, while crime displays no differentiation between truth- and deception-related features and lacks emotional AU combinations. AUs associated with joy (AU 6 and AU 12) appear consistently across well-being, academics, and biography, suggesting some domain-agnostic cues. Overall, our findings indicate that most visual features relevant to deception are domain-specific. This highlights the importance of contextaware approaches in deception modeling and supports the development of more reliable, human-centered AI tools for wellbeing assessment and mental health applications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-05-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/fg61629.2025.11099290
Primary Topic
Deception detection and forensic psychology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring Vision-Based Features for Detecting Deception in Well-Being: A Cross-Domain Comparison

Sayde King, Tempestt Neal
Deception detection and forensic psychology
article

Exploring Vision-Based Features for Detecting Deception in Well-Being: A Cross-Domain Comparison

Sayde King, Tempestt Neal
article en

Abstract

Deception detection has been extensively studied using vision-based features in domains such as crime, finance, and social interaction. However, little attention has been given to how deception manifests visually in self-reported well-being-a critical area for behavioral health, where inaccurate reporting may affect treatment outcomes and the therapeutic alliance. While clinicians often rely on visual cues such as gaze, facial expressions, and body language to assess deception, these cues remain underutilized in AI-based deception detection in wellbeing scenarios. This study explores vision-based features of deception in the well-being domain and compares them with those from three other domains: biography, academics, and crime. Using mock interview data, we extract facial landmarks, body gestures, and facial action units (AUs) using four feature selection methods. We then visualize and analyze the spatial distribution of features associated with truthful and deceptive responses. Results show that well-being features are generally fewer and more localized-particularly around the nose ridge-with unique presence of eye landmarks and limited hand gestures. In contrast, biography and academics show broader facial and body engagement, while crime displays no differentiation between truth- and deception-related features and lacks emotional AU combinations. AUs associated with joy (AU 6 and AU 12) appear consistently across well-being, academics, and biography, suggesting some domain-agnostic cues. Overall, our findings indicate that most visual features relevant to deception are domain-specific. This highlights the importance of contextaware approaches in deception modeling and supports the development of more reliable, human-centered AI tools for wellbeing assessment and mental health applications.

University of South Florida (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Deception detection and forensic psychology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.