Decision-making for Autonomous Vehicles in Unprotected Left-Turn Scenarios Considering Conflict-Aware Nash Equilibrium Selection

Autonomous vehicles (AVs) face significant decision-making challenges in unprotected left-turn scenarios due to complex game-theoretic interactions with human-driven vehicles. The coexistence of velocity constraints and multiple Nash equilibria (NEs) exacerbates the dilemma between decisiveness and safety. This paper proposes a game-theoretic framework addressing three key aspects: 1) generating velocity-constrained trajectories to simplify closed-loop equilibrium derivation, 2) resolving equilibrium multiplicity through spatiotemporal safety analysis, and 3) developing a conflict-aware selection mechanism for safety-critical decisions. Extensive simulations demonstrate 10.46% higher traffic efficiency and 15.24% safety rate compared to conventional game-theoretic baselines, effectively balancing interaction ambiguity resolution with operational constraints.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-06-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/iv64158.2025.11097606
Primary Topic
Transportation and Mobility Innovations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Decision-making for Autonomous Vehicles in Unprotected Left-Turn Scenarios Considering Conflict-Aware Nash Equilibrium Selection

Xiangrui Zeng, Youjun Cao
Transportation and Mobility Innovations
article

Decision-making for Autonomous Vehicles in Unprotected Left-Turn Scenarios Considering Conflict-Aware Nash Equilibrium Selection

Xiangrui Zeng, Youjun Cao
article en

Abstract

Autonomous vehicles (AVs) face significant decision-making challenges in unprotected left-turn scenarios due to complex game-theoretic interactions with human-driven vehicles. The coexistence of velocity constraints and multiple Nash equilibria (NEs) exacerbates the dilemma between decisiveness and safety. This paper proposes a game-theoretic framework addressing three key aspects: 1) generating velocity-constrained trajectories to simplify closed-loop equilibrium derivation, 2) resolving equilibrium multiplicity through spatiotemporal safety analysis, and 3) developing a conflict-aware selection mechanism for safety-critical decisions. Extensive simulations demonstrate 10.46% higher traffic efficiency and 15.24% safety rate compared to conventional game-theoretic baselines, effectively balancing interaction ambiguity resolution with operational constraints.

Huazhong University of Science and Technology (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Transportation and Mobility Innovations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Decision-making for Autonomous Vehicles in Unprotected Left-Turn Scenarios Considering Conflict-Aware Nash Equilibrium Selection — Xiangrui Zeng, Youjun Cao · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS