Driver Expectations for Automated Vehicle Driving Styles in Mixed-Traffic Interactions

As highly automated vehicles (AVs) are deployed in various countries, mixed-autonomy traffic will become common and persist for the foreseeable future. In such environments, AVs must operate in ways which are both predictable and acceptable to human drivers, particularly in complex intersections where negotiation is crucial. However, how human drivers expect AVs to interact with them, particularly in scenarios where the right-of-way is ambiguous, remains unclear. In this research, we conducted a simulation-based video survey of UK drivers (N = 87), investigating their perception of aggressive and defensive AV driving styles under unclear right-of-way scenarios. The analysis indicates that a defensive driving style is generally preferred by human drivers, while an aggressive style can also be acceptable at lower-speed interaction zones. These findings provide empirical evidence for algorithm engineers seeking to design motion control and negotiation strategies that align with human expectations in mixed traffic.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-06-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/iv64158.2025.11097454
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.68

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Driver Expectations for Automated Vehicle Driving Styles in Mixed-Traffic Interactions

Roger Woodman, Kurt Debattista, Zhizhuo Su, Li Zhou
1 citations
Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
0.68
article

Driver Expectations for Automated Vehicle Driving Styles in Mixed-Traffic Interactions

Roger Woodman, Kurt Debattista, Zhizhuo Su, Li Zhou
article en
1 citations

Abstract

As highly automated vehicles (AVs) are deployed in various countries, mixed-autonomy traffic will become common and persist for the foreseeable future. In such environments, AVs must operate in ways which are both predictable and acceptable to human drivers, particularly in complex intersections where negotiation is crucial. However, how human drivers expect AVs to interact with them, particularly in scenarios where the right-of-way is ambiguous, remains unclear. In this research, we conducted a simulation-based video survey of UK drivers (N = 87), investigating their perception of aggressive and defensive AV driving styles under unclear right-of-way scenarios. The analysis indicates that a defensive driving style is generally preferred by human drivers, while an aggressive style can also be acceptable at lower-speed interaction zones. These findings provide empirical evidence for algorithm engineers seeking to design motion control and negotiation strategies that align with human expectations in mixed traffic.

University of Warwick (GB)
University of Warwick
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
0.68
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Driver Expectations for Automated Vehicle Driving Styles in Mixed-Traffic Interactions — Roger Woodman, Kurt Debattista, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS