Autonomous Driving Decision Making Strategies Based on Social Value Orientation and Human-in-the-Loop Mechanisms

Existing autonomous driving systems are optimized for egocentric efficiency metrics, which are in fundamental conflict with the socialized expectations and habitual patterns of human drivers. This contradiction stems from the traditional approach's dual neglect of the trade-offs between self and other in driving decisions, and the culturally rooted social qualities of traffic interactions. To this end, this paper proposes a dual-adaptation framework that integrates social value orientation (SVO) and human-in-the-Ioop(HITL) guidance, modeling vehicular interactions as competitive-cooperative agents by quantifying the social utility function, and dynamically calibrating the SVO parameters with the help of real-time human feedback. The method innovatively transforms abstract social preferences into mathematically tractable decision boundaries, enabling the human-vehicle co-evolutionary mechanism to contextualize self-adaptation according to the regional driving etiquette, and thus cracking the inherent contradiction between individual trajectory optimization and group traffic harmony. Empirical studies based on Highway Env driving scenarios show that compared with pure reinforcement learning methods, this method reduces human-vehicle interaction conflicts while maintaining self-vehicle efficiency. The research results provide a quantifiable interaction paradigm and a verifiable training architecture for the construction of culturally-aware autonomous driving systems through the deep coupling of computational social value modeling and human social intelligence.