Gaze Conformation for L2 Automated Maneuvers

With the rapidly advancing capabilities of Level 2 (L2) automated systems the need for driver confirmation of complex maneuvers, such as entering roundabouts, has been increasingly emphasized to ensure active engagement and safety. This study contrasts confirming maneuvers through control gazes with traditional explicit methods like accelerator use to facilitate seamless interaction and promote the adoption of L2 systems. A simulator study involving 64 participants demonstrated a clear preference for the gaze confirmation system, with significantly higher ratings for user experience, acceptance, and intention to use, without compromising trust compared to explicit confirmation. Participants intervened in case of system failures with either system. The results are building a strong case for daring advanced automation via gaze confirmation to harness progress of L2 systems while preserving safety.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-06-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/iv64158.2025.11097555
Primary Topic
Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Gaze Conformation for L2 Automated Maneuvers

Johannes Illgner, M. Baumann, Nataša Miličić
Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology
article

Gaze Conformation for L2 Automated Maneuvers

Johannes Illgner, M. Baumann, Nataša Miličić
article en

Abstract

With the rapidly advancing capabilities of Level 2 (L2) automated systems the need for driver confirmation of complex maneuvers, such as entering roundabouts, has been increasingly emphasized to ensure active engagement and safety. This study contrasts confirming maneuvers through control gazes with traditional explicit methods like accelerator use to facilitate seamless interaction and promote the adoption of L2 systems. A simulator study involving 64 participants demonstrated a clear preference for the gaze confirmation system, with significantly higher ratings for user experience, acceptance, and intention to use, without compromising trust compared to explicit confirmation. Participants intervened in case of system failures with either system. The results are building a strong case for daring advanced automation via gaze confirmation to harness progress of L2 systems while preserving safety.

BMW (Germany) (DE), Universität Ulm (DE), Technische Hochschule Ulm (DE)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Gaze Conformation for L2 Automated Maneuvers — Johannes Illgner, M. Baumann, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS