On Evaluation of Data Stream Clustering Algorithms: A Survey
Data stream mining is a research area that has grown enormously in recent years. The main challenge is to extract knowledge in real-time from a possibly unbounded stream of data. Clustering, a process in which groupings within the data are to be identified, data streams is an useful technique to extract and identify underlying structures of the data. An open question in the field of stream clustering is how to evaluate the proposed algorithms. In this survey, we review the literature in the domain to identify the common methodologies, datasets, and evaluation measures, used to evaluate the algorithms. We provide a short summary of the stream clustering algorithms in the literature, but our primary focus lies in the survey of cluster validation relevant to the evaluation of data stream clustering algorithms. We begin our literature review with the inception of clustering incrementally, namely with the introduction of the balanced iterative reducing and clustering using hierarchies (BIRCH) algorithm.We identify that the evaluation methodologies primarily focus on performance, and that aspects such as cluster quality are rarely visited. Performance has been the focal point of all evaluation, both in terms of computational performance and accuracy, since the inception of clustering data streams. We also identify that issues that exist in the conventional clustering domain are also present in the data stream clustering. However, minor additions to the evaluation methods can improve both the applicability and usefulness of the algorithms.
Authors
- Veselka Boeva (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3128-191X)
- Christian Nordahl (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7199-8080)
- Håkan Grahn (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9947-1088)
- Marie Persson-Netz
Institutions
- Blekinge Institute of Technology (SE)
Publication Details
- Journal
- IEEE Access
- Published
- 2025-01-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2025.3596435
- Primary Topic
- Data Stream Mining Techniques
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- Knowledge Foundation