Beyond ☪oe✡is✝ence

Among its many achievements, The Ways That Never Parted marked a paradigm shift in the study of Jewish–Christian relations by challenging the notion of rigid, essential group identities and boundaries and emphasizing instead that identities were fluid, discursively constructed, and frequently marked by interaction rather than conflict. While the methodological shifts consolidated in this work have had far-reaching and transformative effects, particularly in the study of Late Antiquity, this paper contends that certain tendencies that have emerged in its wake deserve reappraisal. Specifically, the critique of rigid group boundaries has sometimes led to an overcorrection, downplaying the extent to which identities were embedded within broader social and institutional contexts. Likewise, the rejection of an overemphasis on conflict and violence has at times given rise to an overly harmonious portrayal of Jewish–Christian relations. The paper calls for approaches that avoid both extremes in favor of acknowledging the complexities of identity formation in antiquity as well as the complicated and ongoing interplay between conflict and coexistence. By reexamining these scholarly trends, the paper aims to advance a more balanced understanding of ancient Jewish–Christian interactions, attentive to both the local and translocal sociopolitical forces that shaped them.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Studies in Late Antiquity
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1525/sla.2025.9.3.379
Primary Topic
Classical Antiquity Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Beyond ☪oe✡is✝ence

Simcha Gross
Studies in Late Antiquity
Classical Antiquity Studies
article

Beyond ☪oe✡is✝ence

Simcha Gross
article en

Abstract

Among its many achievements, The Ways That Never Parted marked a paradigm shift in the study of Jewish–Christian relations by challenging the notion of rigid, essential group identities and boundaries and emphasizing instead that identities were fluid, discursively constructed, and frequently marked by interaction rather than conflict. While the methodological shifts consolidated in this work have had far-reaching and transformative effects, particularly in the study of Late Antiquity, this paper contends that certain tendencies that have emerged in its wake deserve reappraisal. Specifically, the critique of rigid group boundaries has sometimes led to an overcorrection, downplaying the extent to which identities were embedded within broader social and institutional contexts. Likewise, the rejection of an overemphasis on conflict and violence has at times given rise to an overly harmonious portrayal of Jewish–Christian relations. The paper calls for approaches that avoid both extremes in favor of acknowledging the complexities of identity formation in antiquity as well as the complicated and ongoing interplay between conflict and coexistence. By reexamining these scholarly trends, the paper aims to advance a more balanced understanding of ancient Jewish–Christian interactions, attentive to both the local and translocal sociopolitical forces that shaped them.

Studies in Late AntiquityVol. 9(3)
California University of Pennsylvania (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Classical Antiquity Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Beyond ☪oe✡is✝ence — Simcha Gross · Studies in Late Antiquity (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS