Quality of Lymph Node Visualization Using a Novel Slim Linear EBUS Bronchoscope vs a Conventional Linear EBUS Bronchoscope

Linear endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) has revolutionized mediastinal interrogation; however, its utility is generally limited to central airways because of size constraints. A novel, slim, linear EBUS bronchoscope with an optional externalized balloon function to allow for a smaller outer diameter and increased flexibility has been developed. How does quality of lymph node visualization of the novel, slim, linear EBUS bronchoscope compare with that of a conventional EBUS bronchoscope, and what is the impact of the sleek external balloon? In this crossover, single-blind study, bronchoscopists performed linear EBUS on human cadavers. The bronchoscopists used two different bronchoscopes, a conventional EBUS bronchoscope (EB-530US; Fujifilm) and a slimmer, more flexible prototype (Fujifilm), to identify native lymph nodes with and without using a contact balloon. Images were recorded and de-identified, and a blinded independent review panel scored each de-identified image by using a Likert scale based on the ability to ascertain lymph node architecture (1 = poor, 2 = average, 3 = good, and 4 = excellent). Eleven bronchoscopists captured 348 individual lymph node images. The mean Likert scores for quality of lymph node visualization were as follows: conventional bronchoscope with balloon, 1.88; conventional bronchoscope without balloon, 1.80; prototype with external balloon, 1.76; prototype without balloon, 2.03. One-way analysis of variance revealed significant differences between the groups ( P < .01). A t test comparing the prototype without balloon and the current gold standard conventional with balloon (2.03 vs 1.88; P = .03) found a significant difference. There were no significant differences broadly between the prototype and conventional bronchoscope (1.89 vs 1.84; P = .19) or between balloon use and no balloon use (1.92 vs 1.82; P = .06). A novel, slim EBUS bronchoscope with increased flexion and no balloon showed noninferior quality of lymph node visualization in the mediastinum and hilum compared with the current gold standard bronchoscope, suggesting that further investigation in human trials is warranted.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
CHEST Pulmonary
Published
2025-08-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chpulm.2025.100202
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.52
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quality of Lymph Node Visualization Using a Novel Slim Linear EBUS Bronchoscope vs a Conventional Linear EBUS Bronchoscope

Jeffrey Thiboutot, Benjamin DeMarco, Lonny Yarmus, Van K. Holden et al.
1 citations
CHEST Pulmonary
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
1.52
article

Quality of Lymph Node Visualization Using a Novel Slim Linear EBUS Bronchoscope vs a Conventional Linear EBUS Bronchoscope

Jeffrey Thiboutot, Benjamin DeMarco, Lonny Yarmus, Van K. Holden, Benjamin B. Claxton, Alireza Latifi, Dylan Wang, Anil Vachani, Christopher M. Kapp, Gaurav S. Ajmani, Victoria González, Jean Reinoso, A. Christine Argento, Christopher L. Gilbert, Hee Jae Choi, Jason Akulian, Cheryl Pai
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Linear endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) has revolutionized mediastinal interrogation; however, its utility is generally limited to central airways because of size constraints. A novel, slim, linear EBUS bronchoscope with an optional externalized balloon function to allow for a smaller outer diameter and increased flexibility has been developed. How does quality of lymph node visualization of the novel, slim, linear EBUS bronchoscope compare with that of a conventional EBUS bronchoscope, and what is the impact of the sleek external balloon? In this crossover, single-blind study, bronchoscopists performed linear EBUS on human cadavers. The bronchoscopists used two different bronchoscopes, a conventional EBUS bronchoscope (EB-530US; Fujifilm) and a slimmer, more flexible prototype (Fujifilm), to identify native lymph nodes with and without using a contact balloon. Images were recorded and de-identified, and a blinded independent review panel scored each de-identified image by using a Likert scale based on the ability to ascertain lymph node architecture (1 = poor, 2 = average, 3 = good, and 4 = excellent). Eleven bronchoscopists captured 348 individual lymph node images. The mean Likert scores for quality of lymph node visualization were as follows: conventional bronchoscope with balloon, 1.88; conventional bronchoscope without balloon, 1.80; prototype with external balloon, 1.76; prototype without balloon, 2.03. One-way analysis of variance revealed significant differences between the groups ( P < .01). A t test comparing the prototype without balloon and the current gold standard conventional with balloon (2.03 vs 1.88; P = .03) found a significant difference. There were no significant differences broadly between the prototype and conventional bronchoscope (1.89 vs 1.84; P = .19) or between balloon use and no balloon use (1.92 vs 1.82; P = .06). A novel, slim EBUS bronchoscope with increased flexion and no balloon showed noninferior quality of lymph node visualization in the mediastinum and hilum compared with the current gold standard bronchoscope, suggesting that further investigation in human trials is warranted.

CHEST Pulmonary
Northwestern University (US), University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US), University of Maryland, Baltimore (US), Johns Hopkins University (US), Medical University of South Carolina (US), University of Pennsylvania (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
1.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.