Generalizing survivor interaction contrast functions for coactive systems to the linear ballistic accumulator model, inhomogeneous Poisson processes, and presenting a novel ‘bare bones’ stochastic process

A typical redundant signals experiment assesses response time (RT) performance when either of two (or more) presented signals is sufficient to make a correct response against response time to respond to either of the signals alone. In some studies perception of both signals takes place faster than either alone and even faster than what a parallel system with independent, unlimited capacity channels can predict. This behavior is referred to as super capacity (Townsend & Nozawa, 1995). In fact, J. Miller’s earlier 1982 data was interpreted as exhibiting performance that was so super capacity that it violated an upper bound on performance through a statistic known in mathematics as the Poisson Inequality, and now referred to in the literature as the race model inequality (RMI). The most popular type of explanatory model assumes that information (treated as an activation random variable in each channel) from two parallel channels is summed into a subsequent single channel where the sum is compared with a criterion activation. Such a process is dubbed coactivation and several specific such models were shown to be able to make such predictions. Then, it was shown by Townsend & Nozawa (1995) that any arbitrary counter model (i.e., with arbitrary stochastic processes for the concurrent counters) perforce predicted violation of the RMI. Further, using the systems factorial technology statistical function named the survivor interaction contrast (SIC), they proved that standard Poisson counter models predict a specific distinctive function for coactive processing. However, other architectures (e.g., parallel and serial models) are entirely general rather than being confined to Poisson counters. Subsequently, Houpt & Townsend (2011) generalized the SIC prediction to the popular Ratcliff–Wiener drift–diffusion process. Our satisfied goal here was to further extend the classes of covered coactive systems to the popular Linear Ballistic Accumulator (e.g., Brown & Heathcote, 2008), the entire class of Inhomogeneous Poisson Processes, and a novel system we call the bare bones stochastic process. In addition, we adduce a set of sufficient conditions that any monotone distribution should meet to predict for their convolution to obey the canonical SIC form. • Demonstrated range of coactive models with canonical survivor interaction contrast. • Develop and explore a novel system, the bare bones stochastic process model. • Enumerate sufficient conditions to elicit the canonical SIC form.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Mathematical Psychology
Published
2025-08-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmp.2025.102937
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Visual perception and processing mechanisms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.43
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Generalizing survivor interaction contrast functions for coactive systems to the linear ballistic accumulator model, inhomogeneous Poisson processes, and presenting a novel ‘bare bones’ stochastic process

James T. Townsend, Joseph W. Houpt
1 citations
Journal of Mathematical Psychology
Visual perception and processing mechanisms
1.43
article

Generalizing survivor interaction contrast functions for coactive systems to the linear ballistic accumulator model, inhomogeneous Poisson processes, and presenting a novel ‘bare bones’ stochastic process

James T. Townsend, Joseph W. Houpt
article en
1 citations

Abstract

A typical redundant signals experiment assesses response time (RT) performance when either of two (or more) presented signals is sufficient to make a correct response against response time to respond to either of the signals alone. In some studies perception of both signals takes place faster than either alone and even faster than what a parallel system with independent, unlimited capacity channels can predict. This behavior is referred to as super capacity (Townsend & Nozawa, 1995). In fact, J. Miller’s earlier 1982 data was interpreted as exhibiting performance that was so super capacity that it violated an upper bound on performance through a statistic known in mathematics as the Poisson Inequality, and now referred to in the literature as the race model inequality (RMI). The most popular type of explanatory model assumes that information (treated as an activation random variable in each channel) from two parallel channels is summed into a subsequent single channel where the sum is compared with a criterion activation. Such a process is dubbed coactivation and several specific such models were shown to be able to make such predictions. Then, it was shown by Townsend & Nozawa (1995) that any arbitrary counter model (i.e., with arbitrary stochastic processes for the concurrent counters) perforce predicted violation of the RMI. Further, using the systems factorial technology statistical function named the survivor interaction contrast (SIC), they proved that standard Poisson counter models predict a specific distinctive function for coactive processing. However, other architectures (e.g., parallel and serial models) are entirely general rather than being confined to Poisson counters. Subsequently, Houpt & Townsend (2011) generalized the SIC prediction to the popular Ratcliff–Wiener drift–diffusion process. Our satisfied goal here was to further extend the classes of covered coactive systems to the popular Linear Ballistic Accumulator (e.g., Brown & Heathcote, 2008), the entire class of Inhomogeneous Poisson Processes, and a novel system we call the bare bones stochastic process. In addition, we adduce a set of sufficient conditions that any monotone distribution should meet to predict for their convolution to obey the canonical SIC form. • Demonstrated range of coactive models with canonical survivor interaction contrast. • Develop and explore a novel system, the bare bones stochastic process model. • Enumerate sufficient conditions to elicit the canonical SIC form.

Journal of Mathematical PsychologyVol. 126
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Visual perception and processing mechanisms
1.43
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.