The Relationship Between Competition Policy and Industrial Policy in an Era of Structural Change

For decades, industrial policy and competition policy have been viewed as inherently conflicting, particularly where state intervention may distort markets. However, the current era of geopolitical uncertainty, technological transformation and fragile global supply chains calls for a rethinking of this dichotomy. This paper argues that competition policy should be seen as a key component of modern industrial strategy, especially for economies seeking to build strategic capabilities. It proposes greater institutional coordination between competition authorities and industrial policymakers to support more effective, forward-looking economic planning. By integrating market analysis and technology foresight into strategic policy design, governments can better navigate the challenges of structural change without repeating the mistakes of past industrial activism.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Intereconomics
Published
2025-08-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2478/ie-2025-0040
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Global trade and economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.09
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Relationship Between Competition Policy and Industrial Policy in an Era of Structural Change

Diane Coyle
1 citations
Intereconomics
Global trade and economics
3.09
article

The Relationship Between Competition Policy and Industrial Policy in an Era of Structural Change

Diane Coyle
article en
1 citations

Abstract

For decades, industrial policy and competition policy have been viewed as inherently conflicting, particularly where state intervention may distort markets. However, the current era of geopolitical uncertainty, technological transformation and fragile global supply chains calls for a rethinking of this dichotomy. This paper argues that competition policy should be seen as a key component of modern industrial strategy, especially for economies seeking to build strategic capabilities. It proposes greater institutional coordination between competition authorities and industrial policymakers to support more effective, forward-looking economic planning. By integrating market analysis and technology foresight into strategic policy design, governments can better navigate the challenges of structural change without repeating the mistakes of past industrial activism.

IntereconomicsVol. 60(4)
University of Cambridge (GB), Bridge University (SS)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Global trade and economics
3.09
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Relationship Between Competition Policy and Industrial Policy in an Era of Structural Change — Diane Coyle · Intereconomics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS