Hyperelastic characterization <i>via</i> deep indentation

Hyperelastic material characterization is crucial for sensing and understanding the behavior of soft materials-such as tissues, rubbers, hydrogels, and polymers-under quasi-static loading before failure. Traditional methods typically rely on uniaxial tensile tests, which require the cumbersome preparation of dumbbell-shaped samples for clamping in a uniaxial testing machine. In contrast, indentation-based methods, which are non-destructive and can be conducted <i>in situ</i> without sample preparation, remain underexplored. To characterize the hyperelastic behavior of soft materials, deep indentation is required, where the material response extends beyond linear elasticity. In this study, we perform finite element analysis to link the force (<i>F</i>) <i>vs.</i> indentation depth (<i>D</i>) curve with the hyperelastic behavior of a soft incompressible material, using a one-term Ogden model for simplicity. We identify three indentation regimes based on the ratio between indentation depth and the radius (<i>R</i>) of the spherical-tipped cylindrical indenter: (1) the Hertzian regime (<i>D</i> ≪ <i>R</i>) with <i>F</i> = <i>ER</i><sup>0.5</sup><i>D</i><sup>1.5</sup>16/9 (<i>E</i> is elastic modulus), (2) the parabolic regime (<i>D</i> ≫ <i>R</i>) with <i>F</i> = <i>ED</i><sup>2</sup><i>β</i>, where the indenter radius becomes irrelevant, and (3) an intermediate regime (<i>D</i> ~ <i>R</i>) bridging the two extremes. We find that the Ogden strain-stiffening coefficient (<i>α</i>) increases the parabolic indentation coefficient (<i>β</i>), allowing for the estimation of <i>α</i> from <i>β</i>. Furthermore, we observe that Coulomb friction increases <i>β</i>, potentially masking the effect of strain-stiffening for small <i>α</i>. However, for <i>α</i> > 3, friction has a negligible effect. Finally, our results show good agreement with experimental data: the two power-law regimes are observed in Ecoflex 10, 30, Mold Star 16, and porcine skin. The extrapolation of α and <i>E</i> from deep indentation and uniaxial tension deviates by at most 20% in these materials. These findings unravel a universal parabolic force-depth scaling in deep hyperelastic indentation and demonstrate that deep indentation offers a reliable and practical alternative to tensile testing for <i>in situ</i> extraction of hyperelastic properties in soft materials.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Soft Matter
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1039/d5sm00502g
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.01

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hyperelastic characterization via deep indentation

Mattia Bacca, Mohammad Shojaeifard
1 citations
Soft Matter
Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
2.01
article

Hyperelastic characterization via deep indentation

Mattia Bacca, Mohammad Shojaeifard
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Hyperelastic material characterization is crucial for sensing and understanding the behavior of soft materials-such as tissues, rubbers, hydrogels, and polymers-under quasi-static loading before failure. Traditional methods typically rely on uniaxial tensile tests, which require the cumbersome preparation of dumbbell-shaped samples for clamping in a uniaxial testing machine. In contrast, indentation-based methods, which are non-destructive and can be conducted <i>in situ</i> without sample preparation, remain underexplored. To characterize the hyperelastic behavior of soft materials, deep indentation is required, where the material response extends beyond linear elasticity. In this study, we perform finite element analysis to link the force (<i>F</i>) <i>vs.</i> indentation depth (<i>D</i>) curve with the hyperelastic behavior of a soft incompressible material, using a one-term Ogden model for simplicity. We identify three indentation regimes based on the ratio between indentation depth and the radius (<i>R</i>) of the spherical-tipped cylindrical indenter: (1) the Hertzian regime (<i>D</i> ≪ <i>R</i>) with <i>F</i> = <i>ER</i><sup>0.5</sup><i>D</i><sup>1.5</sup>16/9 (<i>E</i> is elastic modulus), (2) the parabolic regime (<i>D</i> ≫ <i>R</i>) with <i>F</i> = <i>ED</i><sup>2</sup><i>β</i>, where the indenter radius becomes irrelevant, and (3) an intermediate regime (<i>D</i> ~ <i>R</i>) bridging the two extremes. We find that the Ogden strain-stiffening coefficient (<i>α</i>) increases the parabolic indentation coefficient (<i>β</i>), allowing for the estimation of <i>α</i> from <i>β</i>. Furthermore, we observe that Coulomb friction increases <i>β</i>, potentially masking the effect of strain-stiffening for small <i>α</i>. However, for <i>α</i> > 3, friction has a negligible effect. Finally, our results show good agreement with experimental data: the two power-law regimes are observed in Ecoflex 10, 30, Mold Star 16, and porcine skin. The extrapolation of α and <i>E</i> from deep indentation and uniaxial tension deviates by at most 20% in these materials. These findings unravel a universal parabolic force-depth scaling in deep hyperelastic indentation and demonstrate that deep indentation offers a reliable and practical alternative to tensile testing for <i>in situ</i> extraction of hyperelastic properties in soft materials.

Soft MatterVol. 21(37)
University of British Columbia (CA)
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
2.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.