Integrated Analysis of the Safety Experience in Adults with the Bivalent Respiratory Syncytial Virus Prefusion F Vaccine

<b>Background/objectives:</b> This was a post hoc analysis of safety data across the bivalent respiratory syncytial virus prefusion F (RSVpreF) vaccine clinical trial development program. <b>Methods:</b> Data from eight clinical trials in 46,913 immunocompetent adults who received RSVpreF or placebo were analyzed. Local reactions and systemic events were assessed among non-pregnant ≥18-year-olds (<i>n</i> = 9517); adverse events (AEs) among pregnant and non-pregnant 18-59-year-olds (<i>n</i> = 9238); and vaccine-related AEs among non-pregnant ≥18-year-olds (<i>n</i> = 39,314). Post-marketing data in non-pregnant adults were considered. <b>Results:</b> Local reactions and systemic events were reported more frequently in RSVpreF versus placebo recipients; injection site pain was the most common local reaction (RSVpreF, 18.9%; placebo, 7.4%), and fatigue (23.5%; 18.4%) and headache (19.5%; 15.0%) were the most common systemic events. Percentages of AEs within 1 month after vaccination were similar across groups (RSVpreF, 12.8%; placebo, 13.1%); severe AEs were reported in ≤1.5% of participants. Differences in percentages of individuals reporting vaccine-related AEs between the RSVpreF and placebo groups were <0.2% for all related AEs. Serious AEs throughout the study were reported in ≤14.0% (RSVpreF, 12.6%; placebo, 14.0%). No atrial fibrillation, Guillain-Barré syndrome, or acute polyneuropathy cases were reported. The AE data from post-marketing data sources were consistent with the safety profile from the clinical trial program, with no new safety concerns. <b>Conclusions:</b> Integrated data demonstrated that RSVpreF was well tolerated with a favorable safety profile in non-pregnant and pregnant adults. Ongoing surveillance through real-world use and clinical trial experience continue to support the safety profile of RSVpreF. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03529773/NCT04071158/NCT04785612/NCT05035212/NCT05096208/NCT05842967/NCT04032093/NCT04424316.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Vaccines
Published
2025-08-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines13080827
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Respiratory viral infections research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.35

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Integrated Analysis of the Safety Experience in Adults with the Bivalent Respiratory Syncytial Virus Prefusion F Vaccine

Maria Maddalena Lino, Annaliesa S. Anderson, Kena A. Swanson, David Radley et al.
1 citations
Vaccines
Respiratory viral infections research
1.35
article

Integrated Analysis of the Safety Experience in Adults with the Bivalent Respiratory Syncytial Virus Prefusion F Vaccine

Maria Maddalena Lino, Annaliesa S. Anderson, Kena A. Swanson, David Radley, Kumar Ilangovan, Iona Munjal, Alejandra Gurtman, Emma Shittu, Michael A. Patton, Christos Goulas
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<b>Background/objectives:</b> This was a post hoc analysis of safety data across the bivalent respiratory syncytial virus prefusion F (RSVpreF) vaccine clinical trial development program. <b>Methods:</b> Data from eight clinical trials in 46,913 immunocompetent adults who received RSVpreF or placebo were analyzed. Local reactions and systemic events were assessed among non-pregnant ≥18-year-olds (<i>n</i> = 9517); adverse events (AEs) among pregnant and non-pregnant 18-59-year-olds (<i>n</i> = 9238); and vaccine-related AEs among non-pregnant ≥18-year-olds (<i>n</i> = 39,314). Post-marketing data in non-pregnant adults were considered. <b>Results:</b> Local reactions and systemic events were reported more frequently in RSVpreF versus placebo recipients; injection site pain was the most common local reaction (RSVpreF, 18.9%; placebo, 7.4%), and fatigue (23.5%; 18.4%) and headache (19.5%; 15.0%) were the most common systemic events. Percentages of AEs within 1 month after vaccination were similar across groups (RSVpreF, 12.8%; placebo, 13.1%); severe AEs were reported in ≤1.5% of participants. Differences in percentages of individuals reporting vaccine-related AEs between the RSVpreF and placebo groups were <0.2% for all related AEs. Serious AEs throughout the study were reported in ≤14.0% (RSVpreF, 12.6%; placebo, 14.0%). No atrial fibrillation, Guillain-Barré syndrome, or acute polyneuropathy cases were reported. The AE data from post-marketing data sources were consistent with the safety profile from the clinical trial program, with no new safety concerns. <b>Conclusions:</b> Integrated data demonstrated that RSVpreF was well tolerated with a favorable safety profile in non-pregnant and pregnant adults. Ongoing surveillance through real-world use and clinical trial experience continue to support the safety profile of RSVpreF. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03529773/NCT04071158/NCT04785612/NCT05035212/NCT05096208/NCT05842967/NCT04032093/NCT04424316.

VaccinesVol. 13(8)
Pfizer (United States) (US), Pfizer (United Kingdom) (GB), Pfizer (Italy) (IT)
Pfizer
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Respiratory viral infections research
1.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.