COMPARATIVE STUDY OF M.N. ROY’S NEO-HUMANISM AND MARXISM

According to Roy, humanism, informed by modern scientific knowledge, is what has been called neo-humanism. According to Roy, human history should be explained solely through human beings and not through any external force. External power entails both divine and materialistic elements. Those who think that God created man’s destiny believe in God as the creator of man’s destiny. They do not interpret human history in the same way. Rather, it According to neo-humanism, man is his own creator. And he has the ability to make the world a better place. According to Neohumanism, religion does not have primacy in human life. He does not apply to mystical Humanism does not accept the primacy of religion in human life. It does not admit According to neo-humanism, the more rational and moralistic the foundation, the better. The more restricted society is, the more restrictions placed on a person’s development, the more freedom they will have achieved. Roy’s radical humanism is founded on both materialistic and spiritual principles. Freedom will be archived. Man’s moral sensitivity is the result of his rationality. Roy has rejected supernaturalism, neo-humanism, Marxism, rationalism, and scientific viewpoints. His materialism is founded on a scientific mindset. He has absolutely no religion. Man’s rationality, according to M. N. Roy, stems from natural reason. And man’s moral sensitivity is the result of his rationality Animism, Marxism, Rationalism, and Scientism.