Evaluation Of Metformin Use In Non-Critically Hospitalized Patients At A Single Tertiary Hospital In Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study

The aim of this study was to assess the safety of metformin use in non-critically hospitalized patients. A cross-sectional study was performed at a single tertiary hospital in Saudi Arabia between January 2019 and June 2019. Patients aged >18 years with a confirmed diagnosis of type 2 diabetes who were taking metformin prior to admission were included. The primary outcome was the appropriateness of metformin use in non-critically hospitalized patients. A total of 251 patients were included in this study. Metformin was appropriate in 96 patients (38.2%). There were 14 (5.6%) incidences of absolute contra-indications and 141 (56.1%) incidences of precautions. Non-Saudi patients were about 1.856 times more likely to receive an inappropriate metformin dosage regimen compared to Saudi patients (AOR= 1.856; P= 0.022, 95% CI= 1.093, 3.151). Additionally, patients with chronic kidney disease (stage 3A) were approximately 2 times less likely to receive an inappropriate metformin dosage regimen than patients on stage 5 (AOR= 0.482; P= 0.035, 95% CI= 0.243, 0.835). This study highlighted a high rate of inappropriate metformin use in non-critically hospitalized patients. However, patients who were non-Saudi and at an advanced stage of chronic kidney disease were more likely to receive an inappropriate metformin dosage regimen.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pakistan Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.36721/pjps.2025.38.4.reg.13012.1
Primary Topic
Diabetes Treatment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation Of Metformin Use In Non-Critically Hospitalized Patients At A Single Tertiary Hospital In Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study

Samah Alshehri, Mohannad Alshibani
Pakistan Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences
Diabetes Treatment and Management
article

Evaluation Of Metformin Use In Non-Critically Hospitalized Patients At A Single Tertiary Hospital In Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study

Samah Alshehri, Mohannad Alshibani
article en

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the safety of metformin use in non-critically hospitalized patients. A cross-sectional study was performed at a single tertiary hospital in Saudi Arabia between January 2019 and June 2019. Patients aged >18 years with a confirmed diagnosis of type 2 diabetes who were taking metformin prior to admission were included. The primary outcome was the appropriateness of metformin use in non-critically hospitalized patients. A total of 251 patients were included in this study. Metformin was appropriate in 96 patients (38.2%). There were 14 (5.6%) incidences of absolute contra-indications and 141 (56.1%) incidences of precautions. Non-Saudi patients were about 1.856 times more likely to receive an inappropriate metformin dosage regimen compared to Saudi patients (AOR= 1.856; P= 0.022, 95% CI= 1.093, 3.151). Additionally, patients with chronic kidney disease (stage 3A) were approximately 2 times less likely to receive an inappropriate metformin dosage regimen than patients on stage 5 (AOR= 0.482; P= 0.035, 95% CI= 0.243, 0.835). This study highlighted a high rate of inappropriate metformin use in non-critically hospitalized patients. However, patients who were non-Saudi and at an advanced stage of chronic kidney disease were more likely to receive an inappropriate metformin dosage regimen.

Pakistan Journal of Pharmaceutical SciencesVol. 38(4)
King Abdulaziz University (SA)
King Abdulaziz University
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Diabetes Treatment and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.