The Influence of Ultra-Widefield Fluorescein Angiography on the Diagnosis and Management of Diabetic Retinopathy

<b>Purpose:</b> To study the influence of ultra-widefield fluorescein angiography (FA) on the diagnosis and management of diabetic retinopathy (DR). <b>Methods:</b> Ten experts in DR completed an online survey in which they were asked to diagnose and manage DR cases using different imaging modalities. Experts independently reviewed 20 cases of DR and provided a diagnosis and management plan for each case, first based on ultra-widefield color-free and red-free images alone and again with the corresponding ultra-widefield FA images. Experts were polled on their diagnostic confidence, use of FA in clinical practice, and opinions on the value of ultra-widefield FA. Based on the reference standard diagnosis, primary outcomes included diagnostic sensitivity and specificity with and without ultra-widefield FA. Secondary outcomes included intergrader agreement, expert confidence, management outcomes, and an analysis of experts' opinions on the clinical use of ultra-widefield FA. <b>Results:</b> Diagnostic sensitivity (95% CI) increased from 36% (29%-43%) to 69% (62%-75%) (<i>P</i> < .05) with ultra-widefield FA. Intergrader agreement (Fleiss kappa statistic, 0.29 [95% CI, 0.21-0.27] vs 0.44 [95% CI, 0.40-0.47]; <i>P</i> < .05) and expert confidence (38% vs 65%) also improved. In 39% of responses, management was changed from observation to treatment. Although 40% of experts did not request FA with the initial ultra-widefield color-free/red-free images, 80% found ultra-widefield FA clinically useful when provided. <b>Conclusions:</b> Diagnosis, treatment, and expert opinions on the use of FA all changed when a corresponding ultra-widefield FA was available. Incorporating FA into routine clinical practice may facilitate more accurate clinical decision-making.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of VitreoRetinal Diseases
Published
2025-08-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/24741264251359907
Primary Topic
Retinal Diseases and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Influence of Ultra-Widefield Fluorescein Angiography on the Diagnosis and Management of Diabetic Retinopathy

Joelle Hallak, Gennady Landa, William F. Mieler, Jennifer I. Lim et al.
Journal of VitreoRetinal Diseases
Retinal Diseases and Treatments
article

The Influence of Ultra-Widefield Fluorescein Angiography on the Diagnosis and Management of Diabetic Retinopathy

Joelle Hallak, Gennady Landa, William F. Mieler, Jennifer I. Lim, Rawan Al-Lozi, J. Peter Campbell, Aziz A. Khanifar, R.V. Paul Chan, Nicole Scripsema, Felix Y. Chau, Meenakashi Gupta, Thanos D. Papakostas, Christina Y. Weng, Amani A. Fawzi, Amy Song, Tala Al-Khaled, Jessica G. Lee, Judy E. Kim, Ronald C. Gentile
article en

Abstract

<b>Purpose:</b> To study the influence of ultra-widefield fluorescein angiography (FA) on the diagnosis and management of diabetic retinopathy (DR). <b>Methods:</b> Ten experts in DR completed an online survey in which they were asked to diagnose and manage DR cases using different imaging modalities. Experts independently reviewed 20 cases of DR and provided a diagnosis and management plan for each case, first based on ultra-widefield color-free and red-free images alone and again with the corresponding ultra-widefield FA images. Experts were polled on their diagnostic confidence, use of FA in clinical practice, and opinions on the value of ultra-widefield FA. Based on the reference standard diagnosis, primary outcomes included diagnostic sensitivity and specificity with and without ultra-widefield FA. Secondary outcomes included intergrader agreement, expert confidence, management outcomes, and an analysis of experts' opinions on the clinical use of ultra-widefield FA. <b>Results:</b> Diagnostic sensitivity (95% CI) increased from 36% (29%-43%) to 69% (62%-75%) (<i>P</i> < .05) with ultra-widefield FA. Intergrader agreement (Fleiss kappa statistic, 0.29 [95% CI, 0.21-0.27] vs 0.44 [95% CI, 0.40-0.47]; <i>P</i> < .05) and expert confidence (38% vs 65%) also improved. In 39% of responses, management was changed from observation to treatment. Although 40% of experts did not request FA with the initial ultra-widefield color-free/red-free images, 80% found ultra-widefield FA clinically useful when provided. <b>Conclusions:</b> Diagnosis, treatment, and expert opinions on the use of FA all changed when a corresponding ultra-widefield FA was available. Incorporating FA into routine clinical practice may facilitate more accurate clinical decision-making.

Journal of VitreoRetinal DiseasesVol. 9(5)
Northwestern University (US), Northwell Health (US), Oregon Health & Science University (US), Baylor College of Medicine (US), Medical College of Wisconsin (US), Cornell University (US), New York Eye and Ear Infirmary (US), University of Illinois Chicago (US), Elman Retina Group (US), Ophthalmic Consultants of Long Island (US)
Research to Prevent Blindness, National Institutes of Health, University of Illinois at Chicago
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Retinal Diseases and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.