Safety and efficacy of injectable platelet-rich fibrin with fractional carbon dioxide versus fractional carbon dioxide <i>per se</i> in post-acne scars – A split-face study

Objectives: Injectable platelet-rich fibrin (iPRF) is a second-generation platelet concentrate that uses fibrin matrix which entraps platelets and leukocytes, thus releasing growth factors slowly compared to platelet-rich fibrin. Ablative fractional carbon dioxide (CO2) laser (FCL) uses thermal damage to cause microscopic trauma zones. Combination of the two modalities benefits the patient as iPRF has the ability to induce rapid healing after ablative resurfacing. The aims and objectives of the study are to explore the safety and efficacy of iPRF with FCL versus FCL alone in Grade 3 and 4 post-acne atrophic scars. Material and Methods: There were 40 adult patients with Grades 3 and 4 post-acne atrophic scars. Consent was obtained with knowledge. At baseline, a quantitative Goodman and Baron (GB) score analysis was conducted. Every patient received FCL as part of a split-face research with iPRF done on the right cheek and only FCL done on the left cheek. This was repeated monthly for 3 months with a 2-month follow-up after the 4 th sitting. Post-procedure sunscreen and moisturizer application were advised. Side effects, if any, were noted. Results were analyzed. Results: Both the right and left sides’ mean baseline GB quantitative scores displayed a P = 0.4568. The mean score of right and left side of face on the 5 th visit showed P = 0.0363. After five visits, the left side of the face had a P = 0.0064 and the right side had a P &lt; 0.0001, indicating considerable improvement on both sides of the face. The right side’s mean difference was 4.59 ± 1.27 and the mean difference on the left side was 2.43 ± 0.96 after 5 visits. Conclusion: Combination therapy of FCL with iPRF is a method for treating atrophic scars from acne that is both safe and effective.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Cutaneous and Aesthetic Surgery
Published
2025-08-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25259/jcas_100_2025
Primary Topic
Dermatologic Treatments and Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Safety and efficacy of injectable platelet-rich fibrin with fractional carbon dioxide versus fractional carbon dioxide per se in post-acne scars – A split-face study

Neha Purohit, Kavya Pillai, Rashmi Mahajan, Yash Shah et al.
Journal of Cutaneous and Aesthetic Surgery
Dermatologic Treatments and Research
article

Safety and efficacy of injectable platelet-rich fibrin with fractional carbon dioxide versus fractional carbon dioxide per se in post-acne scars – A split-face study

Neha Purohit, Kavya Pillai, Rashmi Mahajan, Yash Shah, Anil Jain, Nakul S. Mutha, Mayur Navadiya
article en

Abstract

Objectives: Injectable platelet-rich fibrin (iPRF) is a second-generation platelet concentrate that uses fibrin matrix which entraps platelets and leukocytes, thus releasing growth factors slowly compared to platelet-rich fibrin. Ablative fractional carbon dioxide (CO2) laser (FCL) uses thermal damage to cause microscopic trauma zones. Combination of the two modalities benefits the patient as iPRF has the ability to induce rapid healing after ablative resurfacing. The aims and objectives of the study are to explore the safety and efficacy of iPRF with FCL versus FCL alone in Grade 3 and 4 post-acne atrophic scars. Material and Methods: There were 40 adult patients with Grades 3 and 4 post-acne atrophic scars. Consent was obtained with knowledge. At baseline, a quantitative Goodman and Baron (GB) score analysis was conducted. Every patient received FCL as part of a split-face research with iPRF done on the right cheek and only FCL done on the left cheek. This was repeated monthly for 3 months with a 2-month follow-up after the 4 th sitting. Post-procedure sunscreen and moisturizer application were advised. Side effects, if any, were noted. Results were analyzed. Results: Both the right and left sides’ mean baseline GB quantitative scores displayed a P = 0.4568. The mean score of right and left side of face on the 5 th visit showed P = 0.0363. After five visits, the left side of the face had a P = 0.0064 and the right side had a P &lt; 0.0001, indicating considerable improvement on both sides of the face. The right side’s mean difference was 4.59 ± 1.27 and the mean difference on the left side was 2.43 ± 0.96 after 5 visits. Conclusion: Combination therapy of FCL with iPRF is a method for treating atrophic scars from acne that is both safe and effective.

Journal of Cutaneous and Aesthetic SurgeryVol. 0
Suamandeep Vidyapeeth University (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Dermatologic Treatments and Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.