Scientific Ethics and Integrity in the Context of Artificial Intelligence

The article examines the issue of the active implementation of generative artificial intelligence in scientific and research activities. It explores the advantages and risks of artificial intelligence in carrying out research tasks by scientists and analyses the attitudes of young researchers toward the use of AI. It is noted that the application of AI tools in scientific research requires a clear definition of new requirements for researchers and their scientific contributions, as well as the adjustment and supplementation of scientific ethics norms. Furthermore, the development of a new institutional policy on academic integrity is necessary at both the state and higher education institution levels. In an era where AI tools such as ChatGPT, Gemini, and Copilot are widely used to process large datasets, generate text, and assist in the design of scholarly publications, new ethical challenges emerge that require reflection and adaptation of existing academic norms. The study analyses attitudes of young researchers toward the use of AI in the preparation of academic texts and investigates the implications of AI-generated content for the principles of academic integrity, such as originality, transparency, and authorship. Methodologically, the research is grounded in both theoretical approaches (analysis, synthesis, classification, generalisation) and empirical data collected through a questionnaire distributed among postgraduate students majoring in Educational Sciences at Borys Grinchenko Kyiv Metropolitan University. Findings reveal that while a significant portion of respondents actively use AI tools for information retrieval, idea generation, and data visualization, they remain cautious about relying on AI for full-text production. Furthermore, concerns were raised regarding the potential for AI to contribute to unintentional plagiarism, data fabrication, and erosion of individual accountability. The article highlights the necessity of revising national and institutional ethical codes to include clear guidelines on responsible AI use in research. It also emphasizes the importance of fostering critical thinking, human oversight, and ethical transparency when incorporating AI technologies. In this context, the concept of academic integrity is redefined not only as adherence to existing values — honesty, trust, fairness, respect, responsibility, and courage — but also as the ability to navigate emerging technologies ethically. The paper concludes by recommending policy updates, educational initiatives, and the creation of regulatory frameworks that address the ethical dimensions of AI-assisted research. The article attempts to develop recommendations and principles for the use of generative AI in education and research activities and highlights the neeneed for the establishment of a legal framework in Ukraine to regulate the use of generative artificial intelligence.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pedagogical education theory and practice Psychology Pedagogy
Published
2025-02-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.28925/2311-2409.2025.431
Primary Topic
Academic integrity and plagiarism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Scientific Ethics and Integrity in the Context of Artificial Intelligence

Людмила Леонідівна Хоружа
1 links
Pedagogical education theory and practice Psychology Pedagogy
Academic integrity and plagiarism
article

Scientific Ethics and Integrity in the Context of Artificial Intelligence

Людмила Леонідівна Хоружа
article en

Abstract

The article examines the issue of the active implementation of generative artificial intelligence in scientific and research activities. It explores the advantages and risks of artificial intelligence in carrying out research tasks by scientists and analyses the attitudes of young researchers toward the use of AI. It is noted that the application of AI tools in scientific research requires a clear definition of new requirements for researchers and their scientific contributions, as well as the adjustment and supplementation of scientific ethics norms. Furthermore, the development of a new institutional policy on academic integrity is necessary at both the state and higher education institution levels. In an era where AI tools such as ChatGPT, Gemini, and Copilot are widely used to process large datasets, generate text, and assist in the design of scholarly publications, new ethical challenges emerge that require reflection and adaptation of existing academic norms. The study analyses attitudes of young researchers toward the use of AI in the preparation of academic texts and investigates the implications of AI-generated content for the principles of academic integrity, such as originality, transparency, and authorship. Methodologically, the research is grounded in both theoretical approaches (analysis, synthesis, classification, generalisation) and empirical data collected through a questionnaire distributed among postgraduate students majoring in Educational Sciences at Borys Grinchenko Kyiv Metropolitan University. Findings reveal that while a significant portion of respondents actively use AI tools for information retrieval, idea generation, and data visualization, they remain cautious about relying on AI for full-text production. Furthermore, concerns were raised regarding the potential for AI to contribute to unintentional plagiarism, data fabrication, and erosion of individual accountability. The article highlights the necessity of revising national and institutional ethical codes to include clear guidelines on responsible AI use in research. It also emphasizes the importance of fostering critical thinking, human oversight, and ethical transparency when incorporating AI technologies. In this context, the concept of academic integrity is redefined not only as adherence to existing values — honesty, trust, fairness, respect, responsibility, and courage — but also as the ability to navigate emerging technologies ethically. The paper concludes by recommending policy updates, educational initiatives, and the creation of regulatory frameworks that address the ethical dimensions of AI-assisted research. The article attempts to develop recommendations and principles for the use of generative AI in education and research activities and highlights the neeneed for the establishment of a legal framework in Ukraine to regulate the use of generative artificial intelligence.

Pedagogical education theory and practice Psychology Pedagogy
Borys Grinchenko Kyiv Metropolitan University (UA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Academic integrity and plagiarism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.