Epistemic (In)justice as A Process to Decoding Digital Information from Law Perspective

<div>In this digital era, information can be disseminated much easier due to the internet. Under openness <span style="font-size: 1rem;">principle of information on the internet, now we can access information relatively easily When those </span><span style="font-size: 1rem;">condition is viewed from Epistemic Justice theory as postulated by Miranda Fricker means we are going </span><span style="font-size: 1rem;">toward information justice since now almost every people can now contribute and access information, but </span><span style="font-size: 1rem;">the reality says not all those information on social media is the right information, some information can be </span><span style="font-size: 1rem;">categorized as mis-information some as dis-information. Based on those condition this research will then </span><span style="font-size: 1rem;">questioning relevancy between Epistemic Justice in this digital era with legal consequences in Information </span><span style="font-size: 1rem;">and Electronic Transactions Act. This is due to by implementing openness principle it means we can gain </span><span style="font-size: 1rem;">almost any information but also any person now can contribute to provide information for another internet </span><span style="font-size: 1rem;">user. With such conditions we must selective when choose who is our information provider since mis and </span><span style="font-size: 1rem;">dis information in law paradigm can have negative impact toward law subject, and can have legal </span><span style="font-size: 1rem;">consequences. Thats why we needs to rethink again, is from legal paradigm information justice is a good </span><span style="font-size: 1rem;">idea, or do we need to set back to epistemic injustice. The idea to use injustice practice is due to in law </span><span style="font-size: 1rem;">paradigm we must act carefully, and that’s why do we need to rethink again by being selective when we </span><span style="font-size: 1rem;">read digital information</span></div>

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Digital Press Social Sciences and Humanities
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.29037/digitalpress.412479
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.48
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Epistemic (In)justice as A Process to Decoding Digital Information from Law Perspective

Anugrah Anditya
1 citations
Digital Press Social Sciences and Humanities
Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
2.48
article

Epistemic (In)justice as A Process to Decoding Digital Information from Law Perspective

Anugrah Anditya
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<div>In this digital era, information can be disseminated much easier due to the internet. Under openness <span style="font-size: 1rem;">principle of information on the internet, now we can access information relatively easily When those </span><span style="font-size: 1rem;">condition is viewed from Epistemic Justice theory as postulated by Miranda Fricker means we are going </span><span style="font-size: 1rem;">toward information justice since now almost every people can now contribute and access information, but </span><span style="font-size: 1rem;">the reality says not all those information on social media is the right information, some information can be </span><span style="font-size: 1rem;">categorized as mis-information some as dis-information. Based on those condition this research will then </span><span style="font-size: 1rem;">questioning relevancy between Epistemic Justice in this digital era with legal consequences in Information </span><span style="font-size: 1rem;">and Electronic Transactions Act. This is due to by implementing openness principle it means we can gain </span><span style="font-size: 1rem;">almost any information but also any person now can contribute to provide information for another internet </span><span style="font-size: 1rem;">user. With such conditions we must selective when choose who is our information provider since mis and </span><span style="font-size: 1rem;">dis information in law paradigm can have negative impact toward law subject, and can have legal </span><span style="font-size: 1rem;">consequences. Thats why we needs to rethink again, is from legal paradigm information justice is a good </span><span style="font-size: 1rem;">idea, or do we need to set back to epistemic injustice. The idea to use injustice practice is due to in law </span><span style="font-size: 1rem;">paradigm we must act carefully, and that’s why do we need to rethink again by being selective when we </span><span style="font-size: 1rem;">read digital information</span></div>

Digital Press Social Sciences and HumanitiesVol. 12
Universitas Gadjah Mada (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
2.48
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.