An Extended Risk Assessment Framework for Risk Prioritization and Management: Introduction of the Risk Absolute Score (RAS)

Effective risk management is crucial for organizational success. This paper introduces an expanded risk assessment framework that integrates traditional risk scoring with control strength assessment (hereafter referred to as “Control”) to better prioritize and manage potential risks. Using a 1-to-5 scoring system for Impact, Likelihood, and Control, the framework calculates a “Risk Absolute Score (RAS)” by dividing the conventional Risk Score by the Control rating. A higher RAS indicates either a high inherent risk or insufficient existing controls, signaling a greater need for managerial attention. This enhanced risk metric enables organizations to assess risks more holistically, incorporating the effectiveness of existing mitigation measures into prioritization decisions. This paper also addresses the gaps in conventional risk assessment methods and highlights the practical benefits of the RAS framework.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Economic Analysis Letters
Published
2025-06-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.58567/eal04020004
Primary Topic
Risk and Safety Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An Extended Risk Assessment Framework for Risk Prioritization and Management: Introduction of the Risk Absolute Score (RAS)

John Francis T. Diaz
Economic Analysis Letters
Risk and Safety Analysis
article

An Extended Risk Assessment Framework for Risk Prioritization and Management: Introduction of the Risk Absolute Score (RAS)

John Francis T. Diaz
article en

Abstract

Effective risk management is crucial for organizational success. This paper introduces an expanded risk assessment framework that integrates traditional risk scoring with control strength assessment (hereafter referred to as “Control”) to better prioritize and manage potential risks. Using a 1-to-5 scoring system for Impact, Likelihood, and Control, the framework calculates a “Risk Absolute Score (RAS)” by dividing the conventional Risk Score by the Control rating. A higher RAS indicates either a high inherent risk or insufficient existing controls, signaling a greater need for managerial attention. This enhanced risk metric enables organizations to assess risks more holistically, incorporating the effectiveness of existing mitigation measures into prioritization decisions. This paper also addresses the gaps in conventional risk assessment methods and highlights the practical benefits of the RAS framework.

Economic Analysis LettersVol. 4(2)
Asian Institute of Management (PH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Risk and Safety Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

An Extended Risk Assessment Framework for Risk Prioritization and Management: Introduction of the Risk Absolute Score (RAS) — John Francis T. Diaz · Economic Analysis Letters (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS