Who Cares? Unpaid Labor, Human Capital and Inequality In India

India’s hidden economy with unpaid care, childcare, eldercare and any household maintenance is what shapes human capital formation yet continues to remain invisible in national statistics. This paper describes the tension between the static neoclassical view where households outsource care to minimize private costs and the feminist critique which emphasizes care work’s foundational role and the inequalities it reinforces. Using India’s 2014 female-to-male ratio of unpaid care work and the 2019- 20 Time Use Survey, we are able to document that the poorest households shoulder on average 53.9 more minutes of unpaid care per day than the richest households. Afterwards, the paper develops a simple two-period model where period-1 care inputs determine period-2 human capital, that helps show that neglecting the feedback of care can have a consequence of socially mediocre outcomes. Finally, it highlights policy interventions that include paid stipends, expanded public early childhood services and conditional cash transfers that all serve to realign the private incentives of individuals with long term efficiency in mind. The framework of the paper highlights how integrating feminist concerns into a much more dynamic neoclassical model now can guide policies to value and redistribute care and ultimately narrow international inequality.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American journal of student research.
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.70251/hyjr2348.34198204
Primary Topic
Employment and Welfare Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Who Cares? Unpaid Labor, Human Capital and Inequality In India

S. P. Gupta
American journal of student research.
Employment and Welfare Studies
article

Who Cares? Unpaid Labor, Human Capital and Inequality In India

S. P. Gupta
article en

Abstract

India’s hidden economy with unpaid care, childcare, eldercare and any household maintenance is what shapes human capital formation yet continues to remain invisible in national statistics. This paper describes the tension between the static neoclassical view where households outsource care to minimize private costs and the feminist critique which emphasizes care work’s foundational role and the inequalities it reinforces. Using India’s 2014 female-to-male ratio of unpaid care work and the 2019- 20 Time Use Survey, we are able to document that the poorest households shoulder on average 53.9 more minutes of unpaid care per day than the richest households. Afterwards, the paper develops a simple two-period model where period-1 care inputs determine period-2 human capital, that helps show that neglecting the feedback of care can have a consequence of socially mediocre outcomes. Finally, it highlights policy interventions that include paid stipends, expanded public early childhood services and conditional cash transfers that all serve to realign the private incentives of individuals with long term efficiency in mind. The framework of the paper highlights how integrating feminist concerns into a much more dynamic neoclassical model now can guide policies to value and redistribute care and ultimately narrow international inequality.

American journal of student research.
Canadian Heritage (CA)
University of Oxford
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Employment and Welfare Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.