“The Narod in the Historiography and History of Ivan IV’s Reign”

Abstract Historians investigating the reign of Ivan IV frequently employ the word narod (“people”) in their exposition. Indeed that word does occur in sources about Ivan IV ’s reign. However, no one has ever compared the meaning projected onto that term by historians to the meaning it had during the sixteenth century. While it is true that both the historiographic and historical narod can be used inclusively, for all Muscovites, or exclusively, to denote a segment of the population on social, geographic, or simply coincidental criteria, there is a major distinction between its inclusive meaning in historiography versus history. In the historiography the narod sometimes thinks and acts collectively, whereas in the history the narod does neither. The historiographic narod exercises a group agency which the historical narod conspicuously lacks. It would behoove historians referring to the narod during Ivan IV ’s reign to acknowledge this disparity between “the People” and “people.”

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Modern Russian History and Historiography
Published
2025-08-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.30965/22102388-12340039
Primary Topic
Soviet and Russian History
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“The Narod in the Historiography and History of Ivan IV’s Reign”

Charles J. Halperin
Journal of Modern Russian History and Historiography
Soviet and Russian History
article

“The Narod in the Historiography and History of Ivan IV’s Reign”

Charles J. Halperin
article en

Abstract

Abstract Historians investigating the reign of Ivan IV frequently employ the word narod (“people”) in their exposition. Indeed that word does occur in sources about Ivan IV ’s reign. However, no one has ever compared the meaning projected onto that term by historians to the meaning it had during the sixteenth century. While it is true that both the historiographic and historical narod can be used inclusively, for all Muscovites, or exclusively, to denote a segment of the population on social, geographic, or simply coincidental criteria, there is a major distinction between its inclusive meaning in historiography versus history. In the historiography the narod sometimes thinks and acts collectively, whereas in the history the narod does neither. The historiographic narod exercises a group agency which the historical narod conspicuously lacks. It would behoove historians referring to the narod during Ivan IV ’s reign to acknowledge this disparity between “the People” and “people.”

Journal of Modern Russian History and HistoriographyVol. 18(1)
Indiana University Bloomington (US), Film Independent (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Soviet and Russian History
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.