Systemic antibiotic use in fire‐affected koalas (<scp><i>Phascolarctos cinereus</i></scp>) admitted to two wildlife treatment facilities during the 2019–2020 wildfires
Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a global health threat for people and animals, including wildlife. The overuse and misuse of antimicrobials continues to fuel the spread of AMR. We performed a retrospective analysis of systemic antibiotic administration in fire-affected koalas admitted to two wildlife treatment facilities during the catastrophic Australian wildfires in 2019-2020, to assess the practice of antimicrobial stewardship during a wildlife emergency. Triage and treatment records were obtained for fire-affected koalas (n = 355) admitted to two facilities during the wildfires. Analyses showed that 40.3% of koalas at Facility A and 35.0% of koalas at Facility B received systemic antibiotics. The majority of antibiotics (63.9%, comprising multiple types of beta-lactams) administered to koalas at Facility A were prophylactic treatments in koalas with noninfected moderate to severe cutaneous burn wounds. The majority of antibiotics (75.0%, comprising chloramphenicol and enrofloxacin) administered to koalas at Facility B were chlamydial disease treatments. Overall, 29.4% of all antibiotic treatments (predominantly beta-lactams and enrofloxacin) were administered for recorded clinical infections. Where koala-specific guidelines and protocols for treating burn wounds were not available, there was an overuse of systemic antibiotics and frequently sub-optimal antibiotic stewardship in burnt koalas during the 2019-2020 wildfire emergency response. Best practice antibiotic prescribing was also not always feasible due to a shortage of first-choice antibiotics (e.g., injectable chloramphenicol for chlamydial disease). This study highlights the importance of preparedness for future wildfire events and identifies a need for equipping veterinarians with guidelines for treating fire-affected koalas during emergency situations. Additional education, guidance and resources are required to enable appropriate antimicrobial stewardship by responding veterinarians during wildlife emergencies.
Authors
- Ian Smith (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3813-2917)
- JM McLelland
- Fiona K. McDougall (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8669-9702)
- Merran Govendir (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3595-0500)
- Cheyne Flanagan
- Felicity Stoeckeler
- Oliver Funnell (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0006-4703-9377)
- Michelle Power (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3160-4301)
Institutions
- The University of Sydney (AU)
- Zoos Victoria (AU)
- Port Macquarie Base Hospital (AU)
- Sugar Research Australia (Australia) (AU)
- Macquarie University (AU)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Australian Veterinary Journal
- Published
- 2025-08-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1111/avj.70006
- Citations
- 3
- Primary Topic
- Fire effects on ecosystems
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 3.32
Funders
- Morris Animal Foundation
- Macquarie University