Selective Industrial Policy and Innovation Efficiency in Chinese Listed Companies

ABSTRACT For a long time, selective industrial policy has been widely used by governments around the world as a key tool for economic intervention. But how do these policies affect corporate innovation efficiency? This paper examines the Ten Industry Revitalisation Plan (TIRP), an emergency policy response by the Chinese government to the global economic downturn of 2008, treating it as an exogenous shock. The empirical analysis shows that the TIRP significantly reduced innovation efficiency, with this effect proving persistent even after the policy period ended. Mechanism analysis reveals that the policy decreased treated firm innovation efficiency by increasing government subsidies, impairing investment efficiency and exacerbating capital misallocation. Further investigation indicates that the TIRP has a stronger pushing‐up effect on the innovative capital input of firms state‐owned and firms with low productivity and diverts innovation resources to less productive or innovative firms, yielding nonachievement of the expected innovation outcomes. This study concludes that selective industrial policy poses a significant barrier to improving innovation efficiency, offering valuable insights for enhancing economic innovation performance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Economics of Transition and Institutional Change
Published
2025-08-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ecot.70004
Primary Topic
Global trade and economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Selective Industrial Policy and Innovation Efficiency in Chinese Listed Companies

Xiulu Huang, Rui Zhu
Economics of Transition and Institutional Change
Global trade and economics
article

Selective Industrial Policy and Innovation Efficiency in Chinese Listed Companies

Xiulu Huang, Rui Zhu
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT For a long time, selective industrial policy has been widely used by governments around the world as a key tool for economic intervention. But how do these policies affect corporate innovation efficiency? This paper examines the Ten Industry Revitalisation Plan (TIRP), an emergency policy response by the Chinese government to the global economic downturn of 2008, treating it as an exogenous shock. The empirical analysis shows that the TIRP significantly reduced innovation efficiency, with this effect proving persistent even after the policy period ended. Mechanism analysis reveals that the policy decreased treated firm innovation efficiency by increasing government subsidies, impairing investment efficiency and exacerbating capital misallocation. Further investigation indicates that the TIRP has a stronger pushing‐up effect on the innovative capital input of firms state‐owned and firms with low productivity and diverts innovation resources to less productive or innovative firms, yielding nonachievement of the expected innovation outcomes. This study concludes that selective industrial policy poses a significant barrier to improving innovation efficiency, offering valuable insights for enhancing economic innovation performance.

Economics of Transition and Institutional ChangeVol. 34(1)
Northwest University (CN), Xi'an Jiaotong University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Global trade and economics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.