When ChatGPT Speaks About Health: Examining Perceptions of Warmth and Competence Toward AI as a Health Information Source

Recent research indicates that a majority of individuals (78.4%) are willing to use generative AI tools such as ChatGPT for health-related purposes. However, how individuals perceive and evaluate AI as a source of health information remains less understood. Drawing on literature from AI aversion and the stereotype content model, this study compares perceptions of warmth and competence between ChatGPT and human doctors. Results indicate that when delivering the same health information on moderate drinking, ChatGPT is perceived as less warm and competent than human doctors. This perception further leads to decreased intentions to share the information. Additionally, we examine the moderating effect of prior AI exposure, finding that discrepancies in perceived warmth and competence disappear for those with extensive AI exposure. Individuals with substantial AI experience perceive similar levels of warmth and competence and are equally likely to share health information from ChatGPT as from a human doctor.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Health Communication
Published
2025-08-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2025.2540864
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Misinformation and Its Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.40

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

When ChatGPT Speaks About Health: Examining Perceptions of Warmth and Competence Toward AI as a Health Information Source

Buduo Wang, Bruce Wang Shibo, Jiwan Kafle
2 citations
Journal of Health Communication
Misinformation and Its Impacts
8.40
article

When ChatGPT Speaks About Health: Examining Perceptions of Warmth and Competence Toward AI as a Health Information Source

Buduo Wang, Bruce Wang Shibo, Jiwan Kafle
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Recent research indicates that a majority of individuals (78.4%) are willing to use generative AI tools such as ChatGPT for health-related purposes. However, how individuals perceive and evaluate AI as a source of health information remains less understood. Drawing on literature from AI aversion and the stereotype content model, this study compares perceptions of warmth and competence between ChatGPT and human doctors. Results indicate that when delivering the same health information on moderate drinking, ChatGPT is perceived as less warm and competent than human doctors. This perception further leads to decreased intentions to share the information. Additionally, we examine the moderating effect of prior AI exposure, finding that discrepancies in perceived warmth and competence disappear for those with extensive AI exposure. Individuals with substantial AI experience perceive similar levels of warmth and competence and are equally likely to share health information from ChatGPT as from a human doctor.

Journal of Health CommunicationVol. 30(10-12)
Texas Tech University (US)
Texas Tech University
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Misinformation and Its Impacts
8.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

When ChatGPT Speaks About Health: Examining Perceptions of Warmth and Competence Toward AI as a Health Information Source — Buduo Wang, Bruce Wang Shibo, et al. · Journal of Health Communication (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS