<b>Exploring the Effectiveness of Formative and Summative Assessments in Enhancing Student Learning Outcomes: University Teachers Perspectives</b>

This study explored the effectiveness of formative and summative assessments in enhancing student learning outcomes from the perspective of university teachers in Karachi, Pakistan. Formative assessments, typically conducted during the learning process, provide ongoing feedback that helps students identify their strengths and weaknesses, fostering continuous improvement and engagement. By contrast, summative assessments evaluate overall learning at the end of a course or unit. The study employs a qualitative approach, utilizing semi-structured interviews with eight purposefully selected university teachers. The findings reveal that teachers perceive formative assessments as crucial for improving learning outcomes by offering timely feedback, encouraging student engagement, and supporting ongoing learning. Summative assessments, while essential for evaluating overall achievement, were less effective in promoting continuous improvement. Technology integration was highlighted as a key factor in enhancing the efficiency of both assessment types, allowing for real-time feedback and more personalized learning experiences. The study suggests the continued use of formative assessments, the integration of technology, and the importance of teacher engagement in both assessment types to optimize learning outcomes. Keywords: Type of Assessment, Teacher’s Role, Student Engagement, Use of Technology

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Management & Social Science
Published
2025-08-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.63075/mvchzh31
Primary Topic
Online and Blended Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring the Effectiveness of Formative and Summative Assessments in Enhancing Student Learning Outcomes: University Teachers Perspectives

Rizwan Azam, Nasrullah Channa, Saad Muzaffar
Journal of Management & Social Science
Online and Blended Learning
article

Exploring the Effectiveness of Formative and Summative Assessments in Enhancing Student Learning Outcomes: University Teachers Perspectives

Rizwan Azam, Nasrullah Channa, Saad Muzaffar
article en

Abstract

This study explored the effectiveness of formative and summative assessments in enhancing student learning outcomes from the perspective of university teachers in Karachi, Pakistan. Formative assessments, typically conducted during the learning process, provide ongoing feedback that helps students identify their strengths and weaknesses, fostering continuous improvement and engagement. By contrast, summative assessments evaluate overall learning at the end of a course or unit. The study employs a qualitative approach, utilizing semi-structured interviews with eight purposefully selected university teachers. The findings reveal that teachers perceive formative assessments as crucial for improving learning outcomes by offering timely feedback, encouraging student engagement, and supporting ongoing learning. Summative assessments, while essential for evaluating overall achievement, were less effective in promoting continuous improvement. Technology integration was highlighted as a key factor in enhancing the efficiency of both assessment types, allowing for real-time feedback and more personalized learning experiences. The study suggests the continued use of formative assessments, the integration of technology, and the importance of teacher engagement in both assessment types to optimize learning outcomes. Keywords: Type of Assessment, Teacher’s Role, Student Engagement, Use of Technology

Journal of Management & Social ScienceVol. 2(3)
University of Karachi (PK), Quaid-e-Awam University of Engineering, Science and Technology (PK)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Online and Blended Learning
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.