Designing an Empathetic Conversational Agent for Student Mental Health: A Pilot Study

This study presents the design and evaluation of a conversational agent aimed at supporting university students' mental health. We implemented two variants of a chatbot, referred to as A1 and A2, using large language models (LLMs). A1 employed a baseline prompt reflecting a structured yet neutral counseling style, while A2 was an enhanced version incorporating feedback from psychiatrists and findings from a preliminary study. Emotionally rich expressions, conversational variation, and mild self-disclosure are introduced in A2. A mixed-method user study with 18 participants was conducted to compare A1, A2, and human interactions. Results indicated that A2 significantly improved users’ perception of empathy and engagement compared to A1, though human-level rapport was not fully achieved. These findings highlight the role of prompt design in creating emotionally responsive AI companions for mental health support.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14569/ijacsa.2025.0160702
Primary Topic
Digital Mental Health Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Designing an Empathetic Conversational Agent for Student Mental Health: A Pilot Study

Kenichi Minami, Noriaki Kuwahara, Panote Siriaraya, Choi Dongeun
1 links
International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications
Digital Mental Health Interventions
article

Designing an Empathetic Conversational Agent for Student Mental Health: A Pilot Study

Kenichi Minami, Noriaki Kuwahara, Panote Siriaraya, Choi Dongeun
article en

Abstract

This study presents the design and evaluation of a conversational agent aimed at supporting university students' mental health. We implemented two variants of a chatbot, referred to as A1 and A2, using large language models (LLMs). A1 employed a baseline prompt reflecting a structured yet neutral counseling style, while A2 was an enhanced version incorporating feedback from psychiatrists and findings from a preliminary study. Emotionally rich expressions, conversational variation, and mild self-disclosure are introduced in A2. A mixed-method user study with 18 participants was conducted to compare A1, A2, and human interactions. Results indicated that A2 significantly improved users’ perception of empathy and engagement compared to A1, though human-level rapport was not fully achieved. These findings highlight the role of prompt design in creating emotionally responsive AI companions for mental health support.

International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and ApplicationsVol. 16(7)
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Digital Mental Health Interventions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.