Implant-Supported Oral Rehabilitation in Head and Neck Cancer Patients: A 20-Year Single-Center Study (2005–2024)

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> Oral cancer resection often leads to maxillofacial defects and dentition loss, compromising patients' quality of life. Implant-supported prosthetic rehabilitation offers a reliable solution to restore function, though factors such as bone reconstruction, radiotherapy, and timing of implant placement (immediate vs. delayed) may influence outcomes. This study aimed to evaluate long-term implant survival and rehabilitation timelines in oncologic patients, comparing two cohorts (2005-2014 and 2015-2024) to assess the impact of evolving clinical practices. <b>Methods:</b> A retrospective cohort study was conducted at Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón (Madrid, Spain), including 304 patients who underwent ablative oral cancer surgery and subsequent implant-based rehabilitation between 2005 and 2024. Data on demographics, oncologic treatment, reconstruction, implant timing, and prosthetic rehabilitation were collected. Outcomes were compared using Kaplan-Meier analysis and appropriate statistical tests between the 2005-2014 (<i>n</i> = 122) and 2015-2024 (<i>n</i> = 182) cohorts. <b>Results:</b> A total of 2341 Ticare Implants<sup>®</sup> were placed, supporting 281 prostheses. Implant placement during primary surgery increased from 41% to 71% (<i>p</i> < 0.001). The median time from surgery to prosthesis significantly decreased from 24 to 15 months (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Five-year implant survival was 95% in the early cohort versus 97% in the later cohort. Implant survival was comparable between irradiated and non-irradiated patients (~94-96%). Fixed prostheses became more frequent (92% vs. 79%, <i>p</i> = 0.002). <b>Conclusions:</b> Implant-supported rehabilitation in oncologic patients is highly feasible and durable, with improved timelines and functional outcomes associated with early implant placement and modern digital planning strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2025-08-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14155435
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.58
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Implant-Supported Oral Rehabilitation in Head and Neck Cancer Patients: A 20-Year Single-Center Study (2005–2024)

José Ignacio Salmerón Escobar, Carlos Navarro-Vila, Ignacio Navarro Cuéllar, Raúl Antúnez-Conde et al.
2 citations
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
3.58
article

Implant-Supported Oral Rehabilitation in Head and Neck Cancer Patients: A 20-Year Single-Center Study (2005–2024)

José Ignacio Salmerón Escobar, Carlos Navarro-Vila, Ignacio Navarro Cuéllar, Raúl Antúnez-Conde, J. López de Atalaya, Alba García Sevilla, Santiago Ochandiano, Carlos Navarro Cuéllar, Manuel Tousidonis, Ana María López López, Gema Arenas de Frutos, Cristina Maza, Paloma Planells del Pozo
article en
2 citations

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> Oral cancer resection often leads to maxillofacial defects and dentition loss, compromising patients' quality of life. Implant-supported prosthetic rehabilitation offers a reliable solution to restore function, though factors such as bone reconstruction, radiotherapy, and timing of implant placement (immediate vs. delayed) may influence outcomes. This study aimed to evaluate long-term implant survival and rehabilitation timelines in oncologic patients, comparing two cohorts (2005-2014 and 2015-2024) to assess the impact of evolving clinical practices. <b>Methods:</b> A retrospective cohort study was conducted at Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón (Madrid, Spain), including 304 patients who underwent ablative oral cancer surgery and subsequent implant-based rehabilitation between 2005 and 2024. Data on demographics, oncologic treatment, reconstruction, implant timing, and prosthetic rehabilitation were collected. Outcomes were compared using Kaplan-Meier analysis and appropriate statistical tests between the 2005-2014 (<i>n</i> = 122) and 2015-2024 (<i>n</i> = 182) cohorts. <b>Results:</b> A total of 2341 Ticare Implants<sup>®</sup> were placed, supporting 281 prostheses. Implant placement during primary surgery increased from 41% to 71% (<i>p</i> < 0.001). The median time from surgery to prosthesis significantly decreased from 24 to 15 months (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Five-year implant survival was 95% in the early cohort versus 97% in the later cohort. Implant survival was comparable between irradiated and non-irradiated patients (~94-96%). Fixed prostheses became more frequent (92% vs. 79%, <i>p</i> = 0.002). <b>Conclusions:</b> Implant-supported rehabilitation in oncologic patients is highly feasible and durable, with improved timelines and functional outcomes associated with early implant placement and modern digital planning strategies.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 14(15)
Universidad Complutense de Madrid (ES), Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón (ES), Instituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
3.58
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.