The Legal Force of Land Sale and Purchase Receipts in Related Land Control

This research article, entitled "The Legal Force of Land Sale and Purchase Receipts in Related Land Control" in accordance with the formulation of the problem, aims to analyze the legal force of land sale and purchase receipts as evidence and the basis for land ownership. This objective seeks to explain the extent to which receipts are recognized and have evidentiary force in the land and civil law systems in Indonesia. This research, based on the background and conceptualization of the problem, is categorized as normative legal research. It concentrates on content related to principles, systematic methods, and the coherence of laws and regulations. The study describes law as an element of prescriptive discipline. This research uses a descriptive-analytical method, which attempts to describe problems, conditions, or events as they are, thus revealing the actual facts. Based on the research, the Legal Force of Land Sale and Purchase Receipts as the Basis for Land Ownership. Land sale and purchase receipts are recognized as valid evidence of a sale and purchase agreement between the seller and buyer, but their legal force is limited to the relationship between the parties (seller and buyer) only. In civil law, a receipt proves an agreement and payment has been made, thus providing the buyer with the right to demand the transfer of land. However, in land administration, a receipt is not recognized as evidence of a transfer of rights that can be registered. Consequently, a receipt is not binding on third parties and does not guarantee legal certainty of ownership before other parties or the state. In the event of a dispute, a receipt serves only as initial evidence that must be supported by other evidence (physical possession, witnesses, etc.) to be recognized by a judge. The legal force of a receipt is weaker than that of an authentic deed: these private agreements are vulnerable to revocation if they conflict with formal evidence such as a certificate. Therefore, as a basis for ownership, a receipt provides informal and civil legitimacy, but does not provide full legal certainty without further formal steps.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Judicial Law
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54660/ijjl.2025.4.4.70-79
Primary Topic
Regional Development and Environment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Legal Force of Land Sale and Purchase Receipts in Related Land Control

Agung Maulana Husin, Dwi Tatak Subagiyo, Joko Nur Sariono
1 links
International Journal of Judicial Law
Regional Development and Environment
article

The Legal Force of Land Sale and Purchase Receipts in Related Land Control

Agung Maulana Husin, Dwi Tatak Subagiyo, Joko Nur Sariono
article en

Abstract

This research article, entitled "The Legal Force of Land Sale and Purchase Receipts in Related Land Control" in accordance with the formulation of the problem, aims to analyze the legal force of land sale and purchase receipts as evidence and the basis for land ownership. This objective seeks to explain the extent to which receipts are recognized and have evidentiary force in the land and civil law systems in Indonesia. This research, based on the background and conceptualization of the problem, is categorized as normative legal research. It concentrates on content related to principles, systematic methods, and the coherence of laws and regulations. The study describes law as an element of prescriptive discipline. This research uses a descriptive-analytical method, which attempts to describe problems, conditions, or events as they are, thus revealing the actual facts. Based on the research, the Legal Force of Land Sale and Purchase Receipts as the Basis for Land Ownership. Land sale and purchase receipts are recognized as valid evidence of a sale and purchase agreement between the seller and buyer, but their legal force is limited to the relationship between the parties (seller and buyer) only. In civil law, a receipt proves an agreement and payment has been made, thus providing the buyer with the right to demand the transfer of land. However, in land administration, a receipt is not recognized as evidence of a transfer of rights that can be registered. Consequently, a receipt is not binding on third parties and does not guarantee legal certainty of ownership before other parties or the state. In the event of a dispute, a receipt serves only as initial evidence that must be supported by other evidence (physical possession, witnesses, etc.) to be recognized by a judge. The legal force of a receipt is weaker than that of an authentic deed: these private agreements are vulnerable to revocation if they conflict with formal evidence such as a certificate. Therefore, as a basis for ownership, a receipt provides informal and civil legitimacy, but does not provide full legal certainty without further formal steps.

International Journal of Judicial LawVol. 4(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Regional Development and Environment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Legal Force of Land Sale and Purchase Receipts in Related Land Control — Agung Maulana Husin, Dwi Tatak Subagiyo, et al. · International Journal of Judicial Law (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS