A comparison of electrophysiological measures for characterizing the cochlear-implant electrode-neuron interface

The health of the auditory nerve is a key factor for hearing outcomes in cochlear-implant patients. Many electrophysiological markers of auditory-neural health have been proposed, with varying predictive power and independence from non-neural factors. The "Failure Index" (FI), the ratio between stimulation current level and response magnitude of the electrically-evoked compound action potential (eCAP) was compared to the Panoramic eCAP method. Both methods predicted localized areas of reduced neural responsiveness in a group of human cochlear-implant users, but the FI showed a greater dependence on a non-neural factor, namely, the distances between the cochlear-implant electrodes and the auditory nerves.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JASA Express Letters
Published
2025-08-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0038746
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.72

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A comparison of electrophysiological measures for characterizing the cochlear-implant electrode-neuron interface

Fergio Sismono, Dorothée Arzounian, Charlotte Garcia, François Guérit et al.
4 citations
JASA Express Letters
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
5.72
article

A comparison of electrophysiological measures for characterizing the cochlear-implant electrode-neuron interface

Fergio Sismono, Dorothée Arzounian, Charlotte Garcia, François Guérit, Robert P. Carlyon, Tobias Goehring
article en
4 citations

Abstract

The health of the auditory nerve is a key factor for hearing outcomes in cochlear-implant patients. Many electrophysiological markers of auditory-neural health have been proposed, with varying predictive power and independence from non-neural factors. The "Failure Index" (FI), the ratio between stimulation current level and response magnitude of the electrically-evoked compound action potential (eCAP) was compared to the Panoramic eCAP method. Both methods predicted localized areas of reduced neural responsiveness in a group of human cochlear-implant users, but the FI showed a greater dependence on a non-neural factor, namely, the distances between the cochlear-implant electrodes and the auditory nerves.

JASA Express LettersVol. 5(8)
MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit (GB), MRC Epidemiology Unit (GB)
Wellcome Trust, Royal National Institute for Deaf People, Medical Research Council
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
5.72
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.