<sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT of Oligometastatic Disease in Locally Advanced Breast Cancer: PETABC Trial Post Hoc Analysis
Background The optimal treatment of patients with oligometastatic breast cancer and the methods for selecting individuals who may benefit from metastasis-directed therapies are controversial. Purpose To determine the prevalence of oligometastatic disease (OMD; defined as five or fewer distant metastases) in patients with locally advanced breast cancer initially staged at fluorine 18 (<sup>18</sup>F) fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/CT or at CT and bone scintigraphy (CTBS), and to compare patterns of local-regional and distant metastatic disease. Materials and Methods This is a post hoc analysis of data from a prospective, multicenter randomized trial including participants with stage IIb (T3N0) or III invasive ductal carcinoma in the breast between December 2016 and April 2022. Participants were randomized for staging at <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT or at conventional chest, abdomen, and pelvis CTBS. The prevalence of OMD, sites of distant metastases, and extent of local-regional disease were compared using the <b>χ</b><sup>2</sup> test or Fisher exact test. Logistic regression was used to assess the association between imaging and disease extent, with <i>P</i> < .05 indicating a statistically significant difference. Results The study included 369 participants (mean age, 53 years ± 13 [SD]). OMD was more common on <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT scans (19 of 180; 11%; 95% CI: 6.9, 15.9) than on CTBS scans (eight of 185; 4%; 95% CI: 2.2, 8.3; <i>P</i> = .03). Polymetastatic disease (more than five distant metastases) was also more common on <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT scans (24 of 180; 13%) than on CTBS scans (13 of 185; 7%; <i>P</i> = .04). Patients with OMD that was depicted on <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT and CTBS scans had axillary lymph node metastases, but <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT helped to detect extra-axillary regional lymphadenopathy, extra-regional lymph node metastases, and liver metastases more frequently than did CTBS (six of 19 [32%] vs one of eight [13%], three of 19 [16%] vs 0 of eight [0%], and six of 19 [32%] vs one of eight [13%], respectively; <i>P</i> = .63, .53, and .63, respectively). Conclusion At patient presentation, <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT helped to detect OMD in more than one in 10 participants with locally advanced breast cancer, which was more than 2.5 times more often than CTBS, and <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT helped to detect more extensive local-regional metastatic disease. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02751710 © RSNA, 2025 <i>Supplemental material is available for this article.</i> See also the editorial by Ulaner in this issue.
Authors
- Sameer Parpia (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9407-5622)
- Mark N. Levine (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1288-0773)
- Ur Metser (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3726-8994)
- Seyed Ali Mirshahvalad (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2271-9764)
- Ian S. Dayes (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8550-1485)
Institutions
- Ontario Institute for Cancer Research (CA)
- University of Toronto (CA)
- Juravinski Cancer Centre (CA)
- Women's College Hospital (CA)
- Ontario Clinical Oncology Group (CA)
- McMaster University (CA)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Radiology
- Published
- 2025-08-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.243788
- Citations
- 3
- Primary Topic
- Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 4.08