MRI-based Ovarian Lesion Classification via a Foundation Segmentation Model and Multimodal Analysis: A Multicenter Study

Background Artificial intelligence may enhance diagnostic accuracy in classifying ovarian lesions on MRI scans; however, its applicability across diverse datasets is uncertain. Purpose To develop an efficient, generalizable pipeline for MRI-based ovarian lesion characterization. Materials and Methods In this retrospective study, multiparametric MRI datasets of patients with ovarian lesions from a primary institution (January 2008 to January 2019) and two external institutions (January 2010 to October 2020) were analyzed. Lesions were automatically segmented using Meta's Segment Anything Model (SAM). A DenseNet-121 deep learning (DL) model incorporating both imaging and clinical data was then trained and validated externally for ovarian lesion classification. Lesions were evaluated by radiologists using the Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System for MRI and subjective assessment, classifying them as benign or malignant. The classification performances of the DL model and radiologists were compared using the DeLong test. Results The primary dataset included 534 lesions from 448 women (mean age, 52 years ± 15 [SD]) from institution A (United States), whereas the external datasets included 58 lesions from 55 women (mean age, 51 years ± 19) from institution B (United States) and 29 lesions from 29 women (mean age, 49 years ± 10) from institution C (Taiwan). SAM-assisted segmentation had a Dice coefficient of 0.86-0.88, reducing the processing time per lesion by 4 minutes compared with manual segmentation. The DL classification model achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.85 (95% CI: 0.85, 0.85) on the internal test and 0.79 (95% CI: 0.79, 0.79 and 0.78, 0.79) across both external datasets with SAM-segmented images, comparable with the radiologists' performance (AUC: 0.84-0.93; all <i>P</i> > .05). Conclusion These results describe an accurate, efficient pipeline that integrates SAM with DL-based classification for differentiating malignant from benign ovarian lesions on MRI scans. It reduced segmentation time and achieved classification performance comparable with that of radiologists. © RSNA, 2025 <i>Supplemental material is available for this article.</i> See also the editorial by Bhayana and Wang in this issue.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Radiology
Published
2025-08-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.243412
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.79

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

MRI-based Ovarian Lesion Classification via a Foundation Segmentation Model and Multimodal Analysis: A Multicenter Study

Kenichi Oishi, Wen-Chi Hsu, J. Liu, Maliha Imami et al.
4 citations
Radiology
Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
6.79
article

MRI-based Ovarian Lesion Classification via a Foundation Segmentation Model and Multimodal Analysis: A Multicenter Study

Kenichi Oishi, Wen-Chi Hsu, J. Liu, Maliha Imami, Gigin Lin, Jill Chotiyanonta, Ihab R. Kamel, Atif Zaheer, Ruohua Chen, Paul J.L. Zhang, Victoria Shi, Shadi Afyouni, Ghazal Zandieh, Robert C. Ward, Jing Wu, Yih R. Wu, Harrison X. Bai, Jeffrey P. Leal, Yeyu Cai, Zhicheng Jiao, Yuli Wang, Somasundaram Vin
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Background Artificial intelligence may enhance diagnostic accuracy in classifying ovarian lesions on MRI scans; however, its applicability across diverse datasets is uncertain. Purpose To develop an efficient, generalizable pipeline for MRI-based ovarian lesion characterization. Materials and Methods In this retrospective study, multiparametric MRI datasets of patients with ovarian lesions from a primary institution (January 2008 to January 2019) and two external institutions (January 2010 to October 2020) were analyzed. Lesions were automatically segmented using Meta's Segment Anything Model (SAM). A DenseNet-121 deep learning (DL) model incorporating both imaging and clinical data was then trained and validated externally for ovarian lesion classification. Lesions were evaluated by radiologists using the Ovarian-Adnexal Reporting and Data System for MRI and subjective assessment, classifying them as benign or malignant. The classification performances of the DL model and radiologists were compared using the DeLong test. Results The primary dataset included 534 lesions from 448 women (mean age, 52 years ± 15 [SD]) from institution A (United States), whereas the external datasets included 58 lesions from 55 women (mean age, 51 years ± 19) from institution B (United States) and 29 lesions from 29 women (mean age, 49 years ± 10) from institution C (Taiwan). SAM-assisted segmentation had a Dice coefficient of 0.86-0.88, reducing the processing time per lesion by 4 minutes compared with manual segmentation. The DL classification model achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.85 (95% CI: 0.85, 0.85) on the internal test and 0.79 (95% CI: 0.79, 0.79 and 0.78, 0.79) across both external datasets with SAM-segmented images, comparable with the radiologists' performance (AUC: 0.84-0.93; all <i>P</i> > .05). Conclusion These results describe an accurate, efficient pipeline that integrates SAM with DL-based classification for differentiating malignant from benign ovarian lesions on MRI scans. It reduced segmentation time and achieved classification performance comparable with that of radiologists. © RSNA, 2025 <i>Supplemental material is available for this article.</i> See also the editorial by Bhayana and Wang in this issue.

RadiologyVol. 316(2)
Central South University (CN), Johns Hopkins University (US), Chang Gung University (TW), Brown University (US), Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania (US), Johns Hopkins Medicine (US), Chang Gung Memorial Hospital (TW), Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University (CN), University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus (US)
Chang Gung Medical Foundation, Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan, National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
6.79
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.