Dynamic Expectation–Satisfaction Relationship in Sustainable Experiences with Product: A Comparative Study of Durable Goods, FMCG, and Digital Products
This study adopts a dynamic Expectancy–Disconfirmation framework to investigate the evolving nature of user satisfaction across three product categories: durable goods, fast-moving consumer goods (FMCG), and digital products. A 25-day longitudinal experiment involving 128 participants was conducted, during which users engaged with their most recently purchased products and provided repeated subjective evaluations over time. The findings reveal dynamic changes in the influence of expectations and perceived performance on satisfaction throughout the product usage cycle. For durable goods and FMCG, both expectations and perceived performance gradually declined, accompanied by a weakening effect of expectations on satisfaction. In contrast, digital products exhibited greater volatility, lacking a stable experiential baseline and resulting in greater fluctuations in satisfaction trajectories. Moreover, external contextual and emotional factors were found to play a more significant role in shaping satisfaction with physical products, beyond the scope of the traditional expectancy–performance model. These insights offer theoretical and managerial implications for sustainable product and experience design. In particular, they highlight the importance of implementing experience-stabilizing strategies in digital consumption contexts to support user well-being and enhance continuous product utilization, thereby maximizing product potential and reducing waste.
Authors
- Yuting Wu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6825-1434)
- Zhenhua Wu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4552-883X)
- Kenta Ono
Institutions
- Chiba University (JP)
- Soochow University (CN)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Sustainability
- Published
- 2025-08-03
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.3390/su17157045
- Citations
- 4
- Primary Topic
- Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 8.29