The Joint Effects of Valuation Focus and Employer Type on Valuation Specialists’ Perceptions of Organizational-Professional Conflict

SUMMARY Valuation specialists play a crucial role in preparing and auditing fair value measurements (FVMs) but often face conflicts between professional and organizational demands. We surveyed 222 experienced specialists to understand how their primary valuation focus (financial versus nonfinancial instruments) and employer type (professional services firms (PSFs) versus non-PSFs) impact perceived organizational-professional conflict (OPC). Results suggest that financial instrument specialists employed by non-PSFs report higher OPC levels, lower job satisfaction, and increased turnover intentions. However, prior experience in similar organizations appears to mitigate perceived OPC. Further, PSF specialists report higher OPC when they evaluate more FVMs for auditors than they prepare for management. These findings underscore the need for organizations to address role-specific conflicts to improve the retention of specialists in a severely constrained market for their expertise. Results also have implications for the reliability of FVMs in practice. Data Availability: Data are not publicly available, contact the authors. JEL Classifications: M42; M51; M53.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Auditing A Journal of Practice & Theory
Published
2025-08-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-2020-131
Primary Topic
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Joint Effects of Valuation Focus and Employer Type on Valuation Specialists’ Perceptions of Organizational-Professional Conflict

Dereck Barr‐Pulliam, Stephani Mason, Kerri-Ann Sanderson
Auditing A Journal of Practice & Theory
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
article

The Joint Effects of Valuation Focus and Employer Type on Valuation Specialists’ Perceptions of Organizational-Professional Conflict

Dereck Barr‐Pulliam, Stephani Mason, Kerri-Ann Sanderson
article en

Abstract

SUMMARY Valuation specialists play a crucial role in preparing and auditing fair value measurements (FVMs) but often face conflicts between professional and organizational demands. We surveyed 222 experienced specialists to understand how their primary valuation focus (financial versus nonfinancial instruments) and employer type (professional services firms (PSFs) versus non-PSFs) impact perceived organizational-professional conflict (OPC). Results suggest that financial instrument specialists employed by non-PSFs report higher OPC levels, lower job satisfaction, and increased turnover intentions. However, prior experience in similar organizations appears to mitigate perceived OPC. Further, PSF specialists report higher OPC when they evaluate more FVMs for auditors than they prepare for management. These findings underscore the need for organizations to address role-specific conflicts to improve the retention of specialists in a severely constrained market for their expertise. Results also have implications for the reliability of FVMs in practice. Data Availability: Data are not publicly available, contact the authors. JEL Classifications: M42; M51; M53.

Auditing A Journal of Practice & Theory
DePaul University (US), Bentley University (US), University of Louisville Hospital (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.