Shale barrier verification: Rebound effects may affect the conclusions

ABSTRACT: Creeping shale formations can provide efficient barriers around deep wells. Such shale barriers are highly valuable both economically and functionally, however their presence and quality need to be verified by well tests. For the validity of a shale barrier verification test, it is not only important how the procedure is performed, but also when it is performed. Theoretical analyses and laboratory tests show that the sealing efficiency of a barrier can vary significantly with time, specifically in situations where formation of the barrier was initiated or accelerated by a dedicated well operation. A part of the sealing efficiency obtained during the well operation may potentially be lost during a following rebound process of comparable length as the well operation. Knowledge of the rebound effects provides necessary information on when verification tests may give results that are not representative for the long-term quality of the barrier. Hence such knowledge provides guidance for when verification tests should be performed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-06-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.56952/arma-2025-0273
Primary Topic
Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Shale barrier verification: Rebound effects may affect the conclusions

I. Larsen, N. López-González, Tron Golder Kristiansen, Erling Fjær
Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
article

Shale barrier verification: Rebound effects may affect the conclusions

I. Larsen, N. López-González, Tron Golder Kristiansen, Erling Fjær
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Creeping shale formations can provide efficient barriers around deep wells. Such shale barriers are highly valuable both economically and functionally, however their presence and quality need to be verified by well tests. For the validity of a shale barrier verification test, it is not only important how the procedure is performed, but also when it is performed. Theoretical analyses and laboratory tests show that the sealing efficiency of a barrier can vary significantly with time, specifically in situations where formation of the barrier was initiated or accelerated by a dedicated well operation. A part of the sealing efficiency obtained during the well operation may potentially be lost during a following rebound process of comparable length as the well operation. Knowledge of the rebound effects provides necessary information on when verification tests may give results that are not representative for the long-term quality of the barrier. Hence such knowledge provides guidance for when verification tests should be performed.

SINTEF (NO), Aker BP (Norway) (NO), SINTEF Industry (NO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Shale barrier verification: Rebound effects may affect the conclusions — I. Larsen, N. López-González, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS