<i>Hapax Legomena</i> in the Almeida Translation of Job: Testing Almeida’s Dependence on His Two Greatest Influences

The study compares hapax legomena in Job in the Portuguese Almeida translation against their renderings in the Spanish Reina-Valera and the Dutch Statenvertaling to answer questions about Almeida’s competence in Hebrew, his dependence on the Spanish version, the nature of the Dutch influence on his translation, and the differences between the earliest available editions of his translation (1744, 1753, and 1819). The results challenge the narrative of Spanish influence and show differences between the editions, pointing to a shift from an earlier, more independent translation style to a rigorous revision in conformity to the Statenvertaling. The data also show that in fifteen percent of cases in the earliest version, the Almeida translator chose wording that was divergent or nuanced when compared to other translations. This may suggest an independent understanding of the Hebrew text on the part of the translator or an independent use of sources.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Bible Translator
Published
2025-08-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/20516770251332192
Primary Topic
Historical and Linguistic Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hapax Legomena in the Almeida Translation of Job: Testing Almeida’s Dependence on His Two Greatest Influences

Karolina J. Zaremba
The Bible Translator
Historical and Linguistic Studies
article

Hapax Legomena in the Almeida Translation of Job: Testing Almeida’s Dependence on His Two Greatest Influences

Karolina J. Zaremba
article en

Abstract

The study compares hapax legomena in Job in the Portuguese Almeida translation against their renderings in the Spanish Reina-Valera and the Dutch Statenvertaling to answer questions about Almeida’s competence in Hebrew, his dependence on the Spanish version, the nature of the Dutch influence on his translation, and the differences between the earliest available editions of his translation (1744, 1753, and 1819). The results challenge the narrative of Spanish influence and show differences between the editions, pointing to a shift from an earlier, more independent translation style to a rigorous revision in conformity to the Statenvertaling. The data also show that in fifteen percent of cases in the earliest version, the Almeida translator chose wording that was divergent or nuanced when compared to other translations. This may suggest an independent understanding of the Hebrew text on the part of the translator or an independent use of sources.

The Bible TranslatorVol. 76(2)
Jagiellonian University (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Historical and Linguistic Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.