Proof of reserves: a double-helix framework

Cryptocurrency exchanges face increasing pressure to demonstrate reserve adequacy following platform failures, yet current Proof of Reserves (PoR) systems suffer from incomplete verification approaches that examine either on-chain or off-chain assets separately. This study introduces the Double-Helix Framework, a verification methodology that integrates on-chain blockchain analysis with off-chain consensus algorithms to provide complete assessment of exchange financial positions. The framework employs parallel verification strands that simultaneously validate blockchain-recorded transactions and off-chain financial information, creating a unified assessment mechanism that addresses the verification gaps in existing PoR systems. The framework's integration of traditional auditing principles with distributed ledger verification creates new possibilities for regulatory compliance and investor protection in digital asset management. This framework has implications for accounting practice, suggesting that comprehensive cryptocurrency audits require verification approaches that extend to on-chain, off-chain, and intersecting transactions that have varying degrees of separation between ledgers. • Cryptocurrency exchanges have off-chain obligations • People hesitate to participate in crypto protocols due to a lack of exchange transparency • Inspired by DNA structure, the Double-Helix framework attests stablecoin reserves • The framework addresses on-chain, off-chain, and intersecting transactions • Combines reserves and liabilities verification

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The British Accounting Review
Published
2025-08-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2025.101730
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Market Dynamics and Volatility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.13

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Proof of reserves: a double-helix framework

Miklos A. Vasarhelyi, Deniz Appelbaum, Maksym Lazirko
1 citations
The British Accounting Review
Market Dynamics and Volatility
3.13
article

Proof of reserves: a double-helix framework

Miklos A. Vasarhelyi, Deniz Appelbaum, Maksym Lazirko
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Cryptocurrency exchanges face increasing pressure to demonstrate reserve adequacy following platform failures, yet current Proof of Reserves (PoR) systems suffer from incomplete verification approaches that examine either on-chain or off-chain assets separately. This study introduces the Double-Helix Framework, a verification methodology that integrates on-chain blockchain analysis with off-chain consensus algorithms to provide complete assessment of exchange financial positions. The framework employs parallel verification strands that simultaneously validate blockchain-recorded transactions and off-chain financial information, creating a unified assessment mechanism that addresses the verification gaps in existing PoR systems. The framework's integration of traditional auditing principles with distributed ledger verification creates new possibilities for regulatory compliance and investor protection in digital asset management. This framework has implications for accounting practice, suggesting that comprehensive cryptocurrency audits require verification approaches that extend to on-chain, off-chain, and intersecting transactions that have varying degrees of separation between ledgers. • Cryptocurrency exchanges have off-chain obligations • People hesitate to participate in crypto protocols due to a lack of exchange transparency • Inspired by DNA structure, the Double-Helix framework attests stablecoin reserves • The framework addresses on-chain, off-chain, and intersecting transactions • Combines reserves and liabilities verification

The British Accounting Review
Montclair State University (US), Rutgers Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights (NL)
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Market Dynamics and Volatility
3.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.