Increasing Grid Stability: Impact of Charging Characteristics on an Easy-to-Use Priority-Driven EV Load Reduction Approach

The widespread adoption of zero-emission electric vehicles (EVs) and the expansion of charging infrastructure pose significant challenges to the stability of low-voltage (LV) power grids. The increased energy demand from EV charging can cause grid congestion and voltage stability, necessitating effective management strategies to prevent disruptions. Various regulatory and operational measures have been proposed to optimize grid performance and mitigate peak loads. This paper examines the impact of relevant and realistic EV charging strategies-Constant Power (CP) and Constant Current Constant Voltage (CCCV)-on LV grid loading. Through simulations, this paper analyzes the distinct loading characteristics of these charging modes and their effects on a reference grid scenario. An easy-to-use EV load management method-the Priority-Driven Load Reduction Approach—is introduced to enhance grid stability. The findings provide a comparative assessment of charging methods in terms of load distribution, peak demand reduction, and overall grid efficiency. Results indicate that charging characteristics significantly impact grid performance; for example, CCCV reduces transformer stress by up to 5% compared to CP.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-06-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/itec63604.2025.11097999
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.46
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Increasing Grid Stability: Impact of Charging Characteristics on an Easy-to-Use Priority-Driven EV Load Reduction Approach

Maik Plenz, Yuzhuo Fu, Detlef Schulz, Andreas Stadler
2 citations
Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
1.46
article

Increasing Grid Stability: Impact of Charging Characteristics on an Easy-to-Use Priority-Driven EV Load Reduction Approach

Maik Plenz, Yuzhuo Fu, Detlef Schulz, Andreas Stadler
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The widespread adoption of zero-emission electric vehicles (EVs) and the expansion of charging infrastructure pose significant challenges to the stability of low-voltage (LV) power grids. The increased energy demand from EV charging can cause grid congestion and voltage stability, necessitating effective management strategies to prevent disruptions. Various regulatory and operational measures have been proposed to optimize grid performance and mitigate peak loads. This paper examines the impact of relevant and realistic EV charging strategies-Constant Power (CP) and Constant Current Constant Voltage (CCCV)-on LV grid loading. Through simulations, this paper analyzes the distinct loading characteristics of these charging modes and their effects on a reference grid scenario. An easy-to-use EV load management method-the Priority-Driven Load Reduction Approach—is introduced to enhance grid stability. The findings provide a comparative assessment of charging methods in terms of load distribution, peak demand reduction, and overall grid efficiency. Results indicate that charging characteristics significantly impact grid performance; for example, CCCV reduces transformer stress by up to 5% compared to CP.

Helmut Schmidt University (DE)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
1.46
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Increasing Grid Stability: Impact of Charging Characteristics on an Easy-to-Use Priority-Driven EV Load Reduction Approach — Maik Plenz, Yuzhuo Fu, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS