Abemaciclib Plus Fulvestrant in Patients With Hormone Receptor-Positive, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Negative Advanced Breast Cancer: Final Overall Survival Results From MONARCH 2

PURPOSE The MONARCH 2 study demonstrated statistically significant benefit in final progression-free survival (PFS) and interim overall survival (OS) with abemaciclib plus fulvestrant for cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor–naïve hormone receptor–positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–negative (HER2–) advanced breast cancer (ABC) that progressed during endocrine therapy (ET). Here, we report final prespecified OS analyses and other secondary end points. METHODS Patients with hormone receptor–positive, HER2– ABC who had disease progression during ET were randomly assigned 2:1 to receive abemaciclib or placebo, plus fulvestrant. The primary end point was investigator-assessed PFS; key secondary end points included OS and safety, and chemotherapy-free survival was an exploratory end point. RESULTS With a median 80-month follow-up, a total of 440 OS events occurred (abemaciclib, 283; placebo, 157). Median OS was 45.8 and 37.3 months with abemaciclib and placebo, respectively (hazard ratio [HR], 0.784 [95% CI, 0.644 to 0.955]). Although OS benefit was generally consistent across subgroups, a notable numerical benefit was observed in subgroups with poorer prognosis: visceral disease (HR, 0.643 [95% CI, 0.499 to 0.829]), primary resistance to ET (HR, 0.634 [95% CI, 0.436 to 0.922]), and progesterone receptor–negative status (HR, 0.623 [95% CI, 0.405 to 0.959]). Abemaciclib also delayed subsequent chemotherapy initiation (HR, 0.674 [95% CI, 0.562 to 0.809]), with substantial difference in yearly chemotherapy-free survival rates (3-year, 42.0% v 29.3%; 4-year, 37% v 18.6%, 5-year, 32.4% v 14.7%). No new safety signals or cumulative toxicities were identified with prolonged abemaciclib exposure. CONCLUSION These results further validate the clinical benefit previously demonstrated in MONARCH 2, reinforcing abemaciclib plus fulvestrant as an effective treatment option for patients with hormone receptor–positive, HER2– ABC who progressed after previous ET.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JCO oncology advances.
Published
2025-08-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/oa-25-00052
Primary Topic
Advanced Breast Cancer Therapies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abemaciclib Plus Fulvestrant in Patients With Hormone Receptor-Positive, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Negative Advanced Breast Cancer: Final Overall Survival Results From MONARCH 2

Patrick Neven, Eva‐Maria Grischke, Peter A. Kaufman, Antonio Llombart‐Cussac et al.
JCO oncology advances.
Advanced Breast Cancer Therapies
article

Abemaciclib Plus Fulvestrant in Patients With Hormone Receptor-Positive, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Negative Advanced Breast Cancer: Final Overall Survival Results From MONARCH 2

Patrick Neven, Eva‐Maria Grischke, Peter A. Kaufman, Antonio Llombart‐Cussac, Joohyuk Sohn, Valentina Guarneri, Gertjan van Hal, Xavier Pivot, Ashwin Shahir, George W. Sledge, Norikazu Masuda, Meena Okera, Valérie André, Masakazu Toi, Kenichi Inoue, Han Koh
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE The MONARCH 2 study demonstrated statistically significant benefit in final progression-free survival (PFS) and interim overall survival (OS) with abemaciclib plus fulvestrant for cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor–naïve hormone receptor–positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–negative (HER2–) advanced breast cancer (ABC) that progressed during endocrine therapy (ET). Here, we report final prespecified OS analyses and other secondary end points. METHODS Patients with hormone receptor–positive, HER2– ABC who had disease progression during ET were randomly assigned 2:1 to receive abemaciclib or placebo, plus fulvestrant. The primary end point was investigator-assessed PFS; key secondary end points included OS and safety, and chemotherapy-free survival was an exploratory end point. RESULTS With a median 80-month follow-up, a total of 440 OS events occurred (abemaciclib, 283; placebo, 157). Median OS was 45.8 and 37.3 months with abemaciclib and placebo, respectively (hazard ratio [HR], 0.784 [95% CI, 0.644 to 0.955]). Although OS benefit was generally consistent across subgroups, a notable numerical benefit was observed in subgroups with poorer prognosis: visceral disease (HR, 0.643 [95% CI, 0.499 to 0.829]), primary resistance to ET (HR, 0.634 [95% CI, 0.436 to 0.922]), and progesterone receptor–negative status (HR, 0.623 [95% CI, 0.405 to 0.959]). Abemaciclib also delayed subsequent chemotherapy initiation (HR, 0.674 [95% CI, 0.562 to 0.809]), with substantial difference in yearly chemotherapy-free survival rates (3-year, 42.0% v 29.3%; 4-year, 37% v 18.6%, 5-year, 32.4% v 14.7%). No new safety signals or cumulative toxicities were identified with prolonged abemaciclib exposure. CONCLUSION These results further validate the clinical benefit previously demonstrated in MONARCH 2, reinforcing abemaciclib plus fulvestrant as an effective treatment option for patients with hormone receptor–positive, HER2– ABC who progressed after previous ET.

JCO oncology advances.(2)
University of Vermont (US), Kaiser Permanente (US), University of Padua (IT), Inserm (FR), Eli Lilly (United States) (US), Yonsei University (KR), Kyoto University (JP), Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven (BE), Istituto Oncologico Veneto (IT), Hospital Arnau de Vilanova (ES), Universitäts Frauenklinik (DE), Centre for Cancer Biology (AU), Social Insurance Saitama Chuo Hospital (JP), University of Tübingen (DE), Stanford University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Advanced Breast Cancer Therapies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.