The effect of spherical projection on spin tests for brain maps

Statistical comparison between brain maps is a standard procedure in neuroimaging. Numerous inferential methods have been developed to account for the effect of spatial autocorrelation when evaluating map-to-map similarity. A popular method to generate surrogate maps with preserved spatial autocorrelation is the spin test. Here we show that a key component of the procedure-projecting brain maps to a spherical surface-distorts distance relationships between vertices. These distortions result in surrogate maps that imperfectly preserve spatial autocorrelation, yielding inflated false positive rates. We then confirm that targeted removal of individual spins with high distortion reduces false positive rates. Collectively, this work highlights the importance of accurately representing and manipulating cortical geometry when generating surrogate maps for use in map-to-map comparisons.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Imaging Neuroscience
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1162/imag.a.118
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.86

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The effect of spherical projection on spin tests for brain maps

Vincent Bazinet, Bratislav Mišić, Zhen-Qi Liu
2 citations
Imaging Neuroscience
Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
2.86
article

The effect of spherical projection on spin tests for brain maps

Vincent Bazinet, Bratislav Mišić, Zhen-Qi Liu
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Statistical comparison between brain maps is a standard procedure in neuroimaging. Numerous inferential methods have been developed to account for the effect of spatial autocorrelation when evaluating map-to-map similarity. A popular method to generate surrogate maps with preserved spatial autocorrelation is the spin test. Here we show that a key component of the procedure-projecting brain maps to a spherical surface-distorts distance relationships between vertices. These distortions result in surrogate maps that imperfectly preserve spatial autocorrelation, yielding inflated false positive rates. We then confirm that targeted removal of individual spins with high distortion reduces false positive rates. Collectively, this work highlights the importance of accurately representing and manipulating cortical geometry when generating surrogate maps for use in map-to-map comparisons.

Imaging NeuroscienceVol. 3
Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital (CA), McGill University (CA)
Michael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson's Research, Fondation Brain Canada, Canada Research Chairs, Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, Fonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologies
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
2.86
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.