Assessing the validity of three measures of loneliness through correlations and nomological networks

• Compared single item, three-item, and 20-item loneliness measures. • Measures had high correlations, suggesting convergent validity. • Profiles with personality, age, and sex were stronger for multi-item measures. Examining loneliness with self-reports can be done succinctly with a single item, briefly using a few items, or more extensively with longer scales. The present study examines three loneliness measures: a single item, a three-item scale, and a 20-item scale. Participants ( N = 407) completed the three measures of loneliness, a personality inventory measuring six dimensions, and provided demographic information of age and sex. With respect to convergent validity, there were high correlations (between 0.49 and 0.69) among the three loneliness measures. Intraclass correlations demonstrated stronger profile similarity with demographic variables and personality dimensions for the three-item and 20-item loneliness measures compared to the single item. We conclude that each loneliness measure does assess a similar construct but caution using the single item only because of unknown reliability in cross-sectional studies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Current Research in Behavioral Sciences
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crbeha.2025.100182
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Health disparities and outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.33
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing the validity of three measures of loneliness through correlations and nomological networks

Julie Aitken Schermer, Kristi Baerg MacDonald
2 citations
Current Research in Behavioral Sciences
Health disparities and outcomes
4.33
article

Assessing the validity of three measures of loneliness through correlations and nomological networks

Julie Aitken Schermer, Kristi Baerg MacDonald
article en
2 citations

Abstract

• Compared single item, three-item, and 20-item loneliness measures. • Measures had high correlations, suggesting convergent validity. • Profiles with personality, age, and sex were stronger for multi-item measures. Examining loneliness with self-reports can be done succinctly with a single item, briefly using a few items, or more extensively with longer scales. The present study examines three loneliness measures: a single item, a three-item scale, and a 20-item scale. Participants ( N = 407) completed the three measures of loneliness, a personality inventory measuring six dimensions, and provided demographic information of age and sex. With respect to convergent validity, there were high correlations (between 0.49 and 0.69) among the three loneliness measures. Intraclass correlations demonstrated stronger profile similarity with demographic variables and personality dimensions for the three-item and 20-item loneliness measures compared to the single item. We conclude that each loneliness measure does assess a similar construct but caution using the single item only because of unknown reliability in cross-sectional studies.

Current Research in Behavioral SciencesVol. 9
Western University (CA)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Health disparities and outcomes
4.33
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.