“MOB” Mentality?: On the Formation and Consequences of Moralized Opinion-Based Intergroup Conflict in Organizations

Organizations and their employees are increasingly engaging publicly with social issues, such as climate change, systemic racism, and LGBTQIA+ rights. Why does such engagement sometimes result in conflict and dysfunction in organizations? To build a theoretical foundation for answering this question, we bridge insights from research on opinion-based groups and psychological research on moralization to theorize a novel type of group—a moralized opinion-based (MOB) group—defined as an identity group that forms around a shared opinion that has been moralized by group members. We explain how the emotion of disgust affects opinion moralization, and why this makes MOB intergroup conflict uniquely dehumanizing, contagious, and difficult to resolve. We also explain how distinct configurations of MOB groups and formal groups in organizations can foster unique patterns of conflict—ultimately affecting members’ strength of identification foci, as well as their productivity. We offer practical suggestions for more productively engaging with social issues, and suggest a research agenda for better understanding the process and outcomes of MOB intergroup conflict in organizations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Academy of Management Review
Published
2025-07-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2022.0212
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Cultural Differences and Values
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.44
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“MOB” Mentality?: On the Formation and Consequences of Moralized Opinion-Based Intergroup Conflict in Organizations

Michael G. Pratt, Luke N. Hedden, Hamza Khan
1 citations
Academy of Management Review
Cultural Differences and Values
2.44
article

“MOB” Mentality?: On the Formation and Consequences of Moralized Opinion-Based Intergroup Conflict in Organizations

Michael G. Pratt, Luke N. Hedden, Hamza Khan
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Organizations and their employees are increasingly engaging publicly with social issues, such as climate change, systemic racism, and LGBTQIA+ rights. Why does such engagement sometimes result in conflict and dysfunction in organizations? To build a theoretical foundation for answering this question, we bridge insights from research on opinion-based groups and psychological research on moralization to theorize a novel type of group—a moralized opinion-based (MOB) group—defined as an identity group that forms around a shared opinion that has been moralized by group members. We explain how the emotion of disgust affects opinion moralization, and why this makes MOB intergroup conflict uniquely dehumanizing, contagious, and difficult to resolve. We also explain how distinct configurations of MOB groups and formal groups in organizations can foster unique patterns of conflict—ultimately affecting members’ strength of identification foci, as well as their productivity. We offer practical suggestions for more productively engaging with social issues, and suggest a research agenda for better understanding the process and outcomes of MOB intergroup conflict in organizations.

Academy of Management Review
Boston College (US), University of Miami (US), University of Illinois Chicago (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Cultural Differences and Values
2.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

“MOB” Mentality?: On the Formation and Consequences of Moralized Opinion-Based Intergroup Conflict in Organizations — Michael G. Pratt, Luke N. Hedden, et al. · Academy of Management Review (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS